Opinion: Supremes' Rulings Leave Geeks Singing The Blues
A pair of Supreme Court rulings this week -- one condemning file-sharing technology, the other killing cable Internet competition -- deliver a vicious one-two punch to innovation and intelectual freedom.
For those who care about technology, freedom, and competition, this was perhaps the worst week in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Court this week handed down two rulings which will stifle broadband competition, infringe on intellectual freedom, and slow or halt the development of new technologies.
Even for a court that has been on the wrong side of just about every issue involving democracy, the decisions were stunning.
Both decisions were flat-out wrongheaded. Years ago cable companies, by law, were given local monopolies in towns and cities across the country. So they may have laid the cable lines, but the did so only because the law wouldn't allow any competitors to lay cable lines, or compete against them. It's time that stopped. Competition should be allowed to thrive, to drive down prices, and force companies to offer new services. And while DSL offers cable competition, that by itself isn't enough. Cable lines should be open to all competitors.
On the file-sharing case, the justices were wrong as well. It's true that file-sharing is used to infringe on copyrighted content, but the same holds true for VCRs. The Supreme Court years ago ruled that because VCRs could be used for legitimate purposes, VCR makers could not be sued. Should we expect the justices to go after Tivos next? Entrepreneurs from now on are going to be justifiably worried if they develop some new technology that could conceivably be used to infringe on someone's copyright content --- and they may well simply stop development on it.
The only good news from the Supreme Court this week is that this year's session is over. With the judges off on vacation, at least they can't be doing anyone harm.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?