<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Informationweek Personal-tech Commentary]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.informationweek.com]]></link>
<description>InformationWeek</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012, UBM LLC.</copyright>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft Should Make Windows Blue Free]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://www.informationweek.com/software/windows8/why-microsoft-should-make-windows-blue-f/240154750?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Personal_Tech_commentary]]></link>		
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:06 EDT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[Windows 8's gloomy narrative could be rewritten when Windows Blue arrives later this year. The first step is to give it away for free.]]></description>
	</item>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[Twitter Two-Factor Authentication: Too Little, Too Late?]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://www.informationweek.com/security/management/twitter-two-factor-authentication-too-li/240153672?cid=RSSfeed_IWK_Personal_Tech_commentary]]></link>		
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:37 EDT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[Two-factor authentication is a good step. But for securing many sites, Twitter included, it's not enough.]]></description>
	</item>
</channel> 
</rss>  
