News

Senate Committee Pushes Can Spam Act One Step Closer To Passage

TechWeb News

Senate Commerce Committee unanimously approved the Burns-Wyden 'Can Spam Act' and sent it to the full Senate. And Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Ut.) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced another bill that would put repeat spammers in jail for up to five years and levy fines as high as $25,000 a day.

Federal anti-spam legislation moved one step closer to passage Thursday as the Senate Commerce Committee unanimously approved the Burns-Wyden 'Can Spam Act' and sent it to the full Senate.

At the same time, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Ut.) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced another bill that would put repeat spammers in jail for up to five years and levy fines as high as $25,000 a day.


More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

The Can Spam Act, if passed by Congress, would require marketing e-mail to have legitimate return addresses and be clearly identified as advertising. Spammers could be sued by federal prosecutors or Internet providers for a variety of sins, including not removing recipients' names from their mail list if so requested, harvesting names from the Web, or forging addresses. In a sop to legislation proposed by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), the bill also includes a provision for a 'no-mail' list that consumers could use to opt-out of bulk e-mailings.

Hatch and Leahy, meanwhile, introduced yet another ban-spam bill, the Criminal Spam Act. Spammers who use open relays -- unprotected mail servers -- to disseminate their junk mail, or who falsify message headers to disguise their identity would face penalties of up to five years in federal prison (three for a first offense), and fines as high as $25,000 a day.

The Criminal Spam Act joins a veritable host of anti-spam legislation under consideration by the Congress, among them the 'Rid Spam Act,' touted by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-La.).

Related Reading


Informationweek Discussions

Start the Discussion


InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links