Smart Advice: Consider Using SLAs To Manage Outsourcing Vendors' Performance
Service-level agreements can help determine whether outsourcers are meeting metrics if your company plans to outsource long term, The Advisory Council says. Also, when replacing PCs, go for units that can handle software upgrades and pay back the investment; and prepare for the resurgence of B2B by getting systems in order now.
Editor's Note: Welcome to SmartAdvice, a weekly column by The Advisory Council (TAC), an advisory service firm. The feature answers three questions of core interest to you, ranging from career advice to enterprise strategies to how to deal with vendors. Submit questions directly to email@example.com
Question A: How should we evaluate and manage our outsourcing vendors' performance?
Our advice: How you evaluate and manage the performance of outsourcing vendors depends on the sophistication of your outsourcing relationships. Very different approaches are required if outsourcing is conducted on an ad hoc, project-by-project basis than if it's based on a long-term contract backed by service-level agreements. If your company views outsourcing as more than a short-term response to economic conditions, we strongly recommend using SLAs as the foundation for your evaluation and management of the services and deliverables provided by your outsourcers. Supplement SLA-based performance evaluations with assessments of the strength of the relationship with each vendor, and a comparison of their relative price and performance.
Managing Performance Through SLAs
When properly implemented, SLAs are an extremely powerful tool for evaluating performance. SLAs list the services and deliverables expected from an outsourcer, identify metrics for evaluating whether performance meets expectations, and use those metrics to define initial performance standards. Typical categories of metrics for SLA deliverables include volume of work effort, responsiveness, quality, and cost and efficiency. Specific metrics within these categories are chosen based on the type of work performed. Since SLAs are metrics based, they provide an objective report card on current and historical performance, and if problems are identified, they offer a quick means of determining if the subsequent corrections were effective.
Assessing The Relationship
A vendor may meet its SLA performance commitments, but be difficult to work with or offer little value beyond the contracted assignment. As strategic outsourcing relationships are long term, it's important to evaluate the strength and value of the relationship alongside with performance. Key criteria include: ease of working together, flexibility when dealing with changing needs, creativity and responsiveness when solving problems, and willingness and ability to provide value-adding ideas to enhance business performance.
Comparing Price And Effectiveness
The ultimate cost of a service is always an important consideration. Initial prices don't necessarily map to the ultimate cost of a deliverable. For example, a provider may offer the lowest hourly cost but take longer or deliver lower quality than its competitors, leading to higher overall costs. Capture costs and calculate the final (and total) costs of key deliverables to use as comparison against other internal and external delivery options.
Drive Business Value
Evaluating and managing outsourcing vendors' performance requires a combination of objective performance metrics, relationship assessment, and price effectiveness calculations. SLAs provide a good foundation for setting clear, measurable performance standards for outsourcers.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?