Avoiding budget surprises is a top priority for IT. Two main keys: Spend smart up front, then manage licensing and maintenance.
Controlling nondiscretionary spending is a perennial top priority for IT, and the cost of software licensing, operations and maintenance is a particularly sore topic. In our InformationWeek 2012 Enterprise Applications Survey, we asked respondents to rate their satisfaction with nine aspects of on-premises enterprise application technologies. Ongoing maintenance and support came in dead last; initial cost didn't fare much better.
We often see clients surprised by (sometimes substantial) unplanned costs, whether from new licenses to support last-minute projects, vendor changes to licensing metrics or maintenance on legacy platforms. Another problem is a discrepancy between your software licenses and what's actually in use. In our experience, these inconsistencies are driven by factors ranging from inadequate asset management to isolated procurement practices that limit enterprise-wide visibility.
When it comes to something as expensive and complex as software licensing, transparency is critical. Software maintenance is a key revenue stream for large software vendors -- Forrester says recurring maintenance fees can account for nearly 50% of most application vendors' total revenues, and that's growing by 10% annually, so they are being increasingly vigilant in gathering every bit of revenue from in-service agreements.
While we see some interest in dropping a primary software vendor in favor of getting support from a third-party provider such as Spinnaker Support or Rimini Street, we don't recommend that path until these providers mature a bit more. For now, you'll do better by effectively managing maintenance contracts with your primary software providers. To do that, we recommend 12 steps, which fall into two broad areas: getting advantageous terms and tightly managing licensing. (We delve into these in more depth in our full report.)
Terms And Conditions
The first six steps all involve securing favorable terms and conditions by implementing best practices in the contracting process:
1. Slow down year-over-year price escalation. Enterprise and even desktop software is typically in service for at least five years. Rather than settling for the maintenance caps of one or two years commonly offered by software vendors, lock in maintenance rates that are more closely aligned with the expected asset life of the software. Strive for at least five years of fixed maintenance, and address increases beyond five years via a cap on growth, generally no more than 2% per annum thereafter.
2. Lock in pricing for future software purchases, including those resulting from unintentional overdeployment, throughout the term of the agreement, and even beyond if possible. Given vendors' aggressive compliance auditing, ensure that licenses for unintentional overdeployments are covered under the same pricing discounts as intentional, negotiated software purchases.
3. Create terms that allow for an upgrade path without incremental charges. You shouldn't have to pay a vendor more when an upgrade comes out unless you specifically request or want to use new functionality.
4. Create flexible terms that allow for selective termination of maintenance. Rarely does your application portfolio remain constant over the term of the licensing agreement. If you successfully consolidated and retire portions of your portfolio, you should get the cost savings -- and that includes the ability to cease payment for maintenance on licenses tied to retired applications.
5. Establish transferability rights to other business units. You should be able to shift a license among units and substitute individual products. This allows for use of one product to grow and others to wane as portfolio needs change.
6. Avoid "shelfware." While it's always advantageous to maximize discounts by consolidating purchases into large transactions, beware of software vendors bearing bundled product suites.
Google in the Enterprise SurveyThere's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity ≠products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent ≠mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers ≠distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
CIOs Get Smart About BIITís tried for years to simplify business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.