VMware's the virtualization champ, but Microsoft's gaining.
Microsoft has been busy refining the latest version of its virtualization hypervisor, Hyper-V Server 2008 R2. The product now supports live migrations, a clustered virtual machine file system, 64-bit operating systems, and machine specs similar to those of comparable VMware offerings.
With those heavy-duty features in place, it's a good time to look at how viable Hyper-V is as an alternative to VMware's market-leading ESX server virtualization platform. Below, we compare ESX with Hyper-V feature sets in eight critical categories
VMware has a big lead. In our August InformationWeek Analytics survey on virtualization management, in which we asked 316 business technology professionals which hypervisor is their organizations' main virtualization platform, 54% said ESX Server, 15% Hyper-V, and 7% Citrix XenServer.
Two declarations up front. One, I'm a virtualization engineer certified on VMware's vSphere 4.0 and have worked on many VMware implementations. That said, I approached this analysis determined to compare the two systems objectively. Two, the degree of functionality in the Microsoft offering surprised me. VMware is substantially more mature, but Hyper-V is a viable virtualization option now, and it's only going to get better.
1. High Availability
To make use of the products' high availability features, VMware and Microsoft require similar components--two or more virtual host servers with hypervisors installed, a centralized storage medium, and a management server. If a host fails, both systems can evacuate virtual machines to another available host in the cluster. Both systems also can migrate running guests from one node to another. However, VMware can do it for multiple hosts simultaneously, while Microsoft can move live guest machines only one at a time.
From experience, I know VMware has problems migrating large numbers of guests simultaneously and will do only three with the out-of-box configuration. However, this number can be adjusted if the vMotion network, which allows virtual machines to move on the fly, has sufficient bandwidth to replicate the contents of running memory for more than three machines without serious latency issues. VMware's vCenter management software also can be set to move workloads around based on host usage. Microsoft's product can do something similar, but it requires setting the machines up as resources in the cluster before they can be dynamically moved based on usage. This is an area in which VMware is a bit more polished.
Google in the Enterprise SurveyThere's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
CIOs Get Smart About BIIT’s tried for years to simplify business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.