Software // Information Management
Commentary
12/12/2012
10:21 AM
Doug Henschen
Doug Henschen
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Big Data Revolution Will Be Led By Revolutionaries

Why "old-guard" vendors didn't make our list of big data vendors to watch in 2013.

13 Big Data Vendors To Watch In 2013
13 Big Data Vendors To Watch In 2013
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The truest and most memorable insight into IT industry dynamics I ever heard was delivered by Steve Mills, senior VP and group executive of software and systems at IBM. During a 2010 interview we were discussing the relative importance of various layers of the stack, and I asked him, "what's really driving customer technology selections: hardware, middleware or applications?"

"It's money," Mills replied. "That's the No. 1 motivator. And money is not a single-dimensional factor because there's short-term money, long-term money and money described in broader value terms versus the cost of a product. The surrounding costs are far in excess of products."

That line hit me like a ton of bricks, so now no matter how hyped or religious technology debates become, I try to remember that money will determine the outcome. Customer loyalty, inertia, vendor market share, cozy relationships and other factors may intervene, but as in natural selection and economics, the idea is that the best, most cost-effective approach will ultimately win the day.

The context of that 2010 question was whether companies would choose Oracle's engineered systems versus IBM's offerings. After sharing his money line, Mills said IBM is seeing customers switch from Oracle Database to IBM DB2 because the former is expensive by comparison.

[ Want more on how big data might impact incumbent technologies? Read Big Data Debate: End Near For ETL? ]

Money cuts both ways where vendors are concerned. On Monday I had another interview with Mills, this time to talk about IBM's latest big data initiatives. I asked him whether he thinks Hadoop and NoSQL databases might change how or even whether people continue to use relational databases and extract, transform, load (ETL) technologies -- a topic we've explored in recent InformationWeek debates.

"Back in the 1990s the assertion was that object-oriented databases would replace relational databases," Mills responded. "Periodically we get all this excitement about technologies, but it's not a one-size-fits-all world. There are point-product companies that offer a thing, but those things don't necessarily solve the complete problem."

At that point I had already completed our collection of "13 Big Data Vendors To Watch In 2013," but the conversation with Mills confirmed in my mind the decision not to include any incumbent vendors from the relational database world.

It's not that I disagree with Mills. In fact, I'd guess that some of the vendors that did make my list won't be around five years from now. All of these vendors are focused pretty much on one thing, and if it doesn't work out, well, then there's always the next startup. On the other hand, their pure, undiluted and uncompromised attention to one product tends to focus the vendor on building a better, more cost-effective product. Hadoop and NoSQL platforms are proving to be more scalable, flexible and affordable in big-data deployments, and that's why they are the focus of the "13 To Watch" collection.

IBM does, in fact, have a Hadoop option. I recall Rod Smith, VP of emerging Internet technologies, presenting on IBM's research on Hadoop way back at Hadoop World NYC in 2009. But it then took two years for IBM to release its InfoSphere BigInsights Hadoop software distribution.

Mills insists that "thousands of customers" are using BigInsights, but there are few signs of a big commercial push. I haven't heard many customer names. It feels like window dressing. Similarly, Mills said Monday that NoSQL structures can be managed by IBM DB2, but I never hear about it being used as a NoSQL database.

DB2 was the incumbent database at Constant Contact, but the digital marketing services company chose the open-source Cassandra NoSQL database when it decided to provide social marketing services as well as e-mail campaigns. By Constant Contact's estimates the relational route would have required a $2.5 million investment and nine months of development. It deployed Cassandra, supported by DataStax, within three months at a cost of $250,000. In short, money won.

IBM isn't the only relational incumbent that seems to be taking an arm's length approach to new big data platforms. Teradata's thinking about Hadoop has clearly evolved. I recall conversations with CTO Stephen Brobst in 2010 in which he downplayed the importance of Hadoop, slammed its performance and served up the well-worn "open source isn't free" argument. One year later Teradata acquired AsterData so it could support MapReduce processing within a relational database environment. Then in October, Teradata announced it will support Hadoop nodes alongside relational nodes on a single appliance, mirroring a strategy EMC Greenplum adopted at least a year earlier.

Oracle and Microsoft are the latest big names to offer Hadoop, in this case through partnerships with Cloudera and Hortonworks, respectively. I'm guessing those moves helped persuade database newbie SAP to jump on the big data bandwagon by adding a Hadoop connector.

At SAS I've heard the open-source-ain't-free argument from CEO Jim Goodnight more than once. Nonetheless, SAS added support for open-source R-based statistical models a couple of years ago at the behest of customers who didn't want to have to spend time and money developing stuff that was already available from the R community.

I could cite other examples, but my point is that incumbents all too often suffer from not-invented-here syndrome. If they embrace potentially disruptive technologies at all, it tends to be a late, shallow or half-hearted embrace. That's because what might get disrupted is the flow of money from incumbent technologies.

There's a lot going on in the world of big data, and I agree with Mills' point that companies using new platforms will still have to address data integration, data quality, data governance, backup, recovery and so on. They'll also still need conventional relational databases and business intelligence and analytic systems for all the proven applications and new applications to come that will run on those incumbent platforms. But if the question is which vendors will really champion and innovate big data platforms such as Hadoop, NoSQL and related analytics systems, you have to look to the companies that have all their money riding on these new environments.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
David Berlind
50%
50%
David Berlind,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2012 | 12:08:00 AM
re: Big Data Revolution Will Be Led By Revolutionaries
Great article Doug. I too had one of those great Steve Mills moments when, during an interview, he talked about the importance of "customer moments of truth" and the role that systems can play in ensuring that companies don't blow those moments. He referred me to Jan Carlzon's book called "Moments of Truth" (http://www.amazon.com/Moments-.... Carlzon turned Scandanavian Airlines around by making those customer moments of truth the lynchpin to the company's success. And it worked... and it was clear Mills was on to something because of how bits and bytes are now involved in so many of those moments of truth. I know that this has nothing to do with the big data angle of what you've written here, but Mills continues to exhibit great insight into what matters for businesses.
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
12/13/2012 | 3:58:45 PM
re: Big Data Revolution Will Be Led By Revolutionaries
The list is InformationWeek's, not Mills'. Points well taken, though, on the importance of near real-time and you're characterization of this list as "circa 2012." We'll see if the streaming solutions really take off in 2013. Dremel's capabilites are just becoming available by way of Google BigQuery, and it appears Cloudera is responding with Impala.

Meanwhile, we'll take a look at ParStream. Feel free to contact me, particularly if you have customers who can speak to the advantages.

Doug Henschen
InformationWeek
mhummel515
50%
50%
mhummel515,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/12/2012 | 8:20:00 PM
re: Big Data Revolution Will Be Led By Revolutionaries
Big Data is not only MapReduce / key-value. Mill's list is great from a current point of view but we will see other approaches to big data analytics in 2013 gaining traction.
Hadoop and the other H* products are very popular, because they were the first products to scale - but not the best. MapReduce is not at all known for efficiency or low infrastructure consumption - it is know for scaling on very large data sets.

Think back to Google when they announced in 2010 !!! that they discarded MapReduce for its inability to provide near-real-time querying and continuous data import. Why do you think Google has developed Dremel?

I agree with Mill's list from a current point of view (should be called: big and emerging players in 2012) but for the next year we have to take a broader look at the big data topic.

ParStream would like to throw its hat into the circle.
Happy to answer your questions and discuss with you.
EricLundquist
50%
50%
EricLundquist,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/12/2012 | 6:01:44 PM
re: Big Data Revolution Will Be Led By Revolutionaries
Mills advice to follow the money made sense when he said it and makes sense now. The incumbent vendors are run by smart execs but stuck in an old cost plus model that is crumbling under the new service-based tech economy. Your 2013 list makes a lot of sense.
The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 7, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.