Software // Information Management
04:46 PM
Ted Kemp
Ted Kemp
The Analytics Job and Salary Outlook for 2016
Jan 28, 2016
With data science and big data top-of-mind for all types of organizations, hiring analytics profes ...Read More>>

De-Fragmenting Data

Hey, I have an idea. Let's rename March 'Data Integration Month.'

March has seen the stars align and get everybody in BI thinking about one thing first and foremost: data integration.

First, IBM announced its acquisition of Ascential, a move that Big Blue hopes will shore up the data integration capabilities it can provide to customers under its own name. Almost as soon as that news came out, we began to hear whisperings that Informatica would be the next integration vendor purchased by an enterprise software maker -- though by which one is a bit of a mystery, considering Oracle's struggle to integrate PeopleSoft and its time-consuming fight with SAP for the rights to Retek. You can read more about that here.

Next came a bit of news from another independent integration vendor, Tibco Software, which responded to IBM's Ascential news with the debut of its own, new data integration tool. Tibco has also made it clear recently that you don't need to be the size of IBM to make an acquisition or two to boost your capabilities.

Most Business Intelligence Pipeline readers, especially those from bigger firms, understand quite well already why data integration is at the front of a lot of folks' minds these days. But if you could use a little more background -- and hey, there's nothing wrong with that -- check out a story we just ran that examines the underlying causes behind the craze to integrate. As Rick Whiting and Charles Babcock of InformationWeek explain, "Companies are trying to absorb more information faster and from more far-flung sources so they can understand and adapt to customers' needs more quickly. Yet data remains fragmented at most companies, scattered across enterprise-resource-planning and customer-relationship-management applications, legacy systems, and disparate databases."

And now to change gears for just a second, let's talk about data security: Business intelligence and security are two separate fields of IT expertise, but both are built around data. It's that fact -- combined with a spate of recent, embarrassing security breaches at LexisNexis, ChoicePoint and elsewhere -- that prompted me to ask how you feel about the safety of data at your organization. As usual, Business Intelligence Pipeline readers provided eye-opening answers.

BI practitioners were almost evenly split in our latest poll, with 46 percent of respondents describing their data security as either "rock solid" or "safe enough." But 54 percent either said their organizations need to make security improvements or said they're "not too confident" about their data security. We've known for a while now that data quality is a big problem at all sorts of companies engaged in BI. We can add data security as another potential pitfall that, even if it won't endanger BI efforts directly, sure as heck can drag an organization's name through the mud.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The Agile Archive
The Agile Archive
When it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
How to Knock Down Barriers to Effective Risk Management
Risk management today is a hodgepodge of systems, siloed approaches, and poor data collection practices. That isn't how it should be.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.