The federal government's newly detailed voluntary, standardized process to make sure cloud computing services meet government security requirements was supposed to facilitate the adoption of innovative technologies, but in its current iteration, it may fall short.
The federal government's newly detailed voluntary, standardized process to make sure cloud computing services meet government security requirements was supposed to facilitate the adoption of innovative technologies, but in its current iteration, it may fall short.First, a bit of background to set the stage. Today, agencies typically take apps and services through their own security accreditation processes, regardless of whether other agencies have already authorized the same systems for government use. The FedRAMP process is designed to eliminate duplication and reduce costs with a standardized process. Once a service is certified by FedRAMP, other agencies can leverage the certification, thereby speeding up time to deployment for cloud services.
However, one problem is that FedRAMP, as it's currently proposed (it's was released earlier this week in draft form) requires that agencies looking to deploy particular services sponsor those services' certifications. Vendors can't request certification on their own, nor can the Office of Management and Budget (which heads up IT policy for the feds) or General Services Administration (which is running FedRAMP) simply pick and choose a list of suppliers whose services they want to certify.
That may keep the burden on the young FedRAMP process low by pushing only those services through the process that are going to be adopted by agencies. However, it may also shut-out start-ups.
The first companies whose products get certified on FedRAMP will inevitably be the big players who are actively courting government customers and/or already have active government deployments. IBM, Microsoft and Google have all said they have FedRAMP certifications in waiting, and companies like Amazon.com, EMC and Salesforce.com are sure to be close on their heels.
Security accreditation is estimated to cost six figures, and that's a big chunk of change to drop on an unproven start-up that may only have one product an agency wants to use. What's an agency to do? Is it to drop $100,000 to certify a start-up's niche service that meets all of an agency's needs, or simply leverage the pre-existing authorization of a Microsoft product that meets most of its needs? The prudent course might be to leverage Microsoft's authorization rather than open up the wallet, especially in a period of budget crunches.
Unfortunately, that'll keep the universe of authorized services relatively small, and the same services may be used over and over. There's got to be a better way to close the gap between the government and start-ups, many of whom already shy away from government business because it's too expensive and arduous.
The Agile ArchiveWhen it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
2014 Analytics, BI, and Information Management SurveyITís tried for years to simplify data analytics and business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.