Dimension hierarchies and pre-computed aggregations can make or break your data warehouse. Here's how to design, load and maintain true hierarchies while working around bad data sources and optimizing for usability and performance.
Load Normalized Data
The date dimension hierarchies are easy to load and maintain. Nothing is more predictable than the calendar, and no user intervention is required. Other dimensions are often populated from imperfect source systems, including the least perfect of all: the spreadsheet.
If your source systems are imperfect, managing the hierarchies over time is painful. Optimally, hierarchies should be maintained before the data warehouse — in the transaction system or a master data management (MDM) system. With good normalized source data, the data warehouse will never see malformed data. In the real world, we're not always so lucky. Data warehouse teams have been managing master data for decades and in many organizations will continue to do so.
Consider a product dimension for a retail store, with a hierarchy that goes from product to brand, category, and department. In this example, the product hierarchy isn't officially part of the transaction systems, but instead is managed by business users in the Marketing department. When we initially load the data warehouse, our incoming data is as illustrated in table below:
The scenario described here is not ideal: this product dimension is not well maintained by the source systems. Most of it is fine, but notice the last row of data: we have a typo in the category, which breaks referential integrity. The "Ice Creamy" brand in one row rolls up to Frozen Desserts, and in another row to Frozen. This is forbidden.
You should find and fix problems like these early on, before you even start building the ETL system. Your ETL system must implement checks, to confirm that each category rolls to one department, and each brand to one category. But by the time you're actually loading the historical data, you should have worked with the source systems and business users to fix the data errors.
The real challenge lies with ongoing updates of the dimension table. We don't have time during nightly processing to have a person examine a suspect row and make an intelligent determination about what to do. If the data arriving at the ETL system's door is suspect, the ETL system can't distinguish between bad data and intentional changes. This is one of the hazards of developing a prototype or proof of concept. It's easy to fix up the data on a one-time basis; keeping it clean over time is hard.
The Agile ArchiveWhen it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
2014 Analytics, BI, and Information Management SurveyITís tried for years to simplify data analytics and business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of April 24, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week!