Kimball University: Overcoming Obstacles When Gathering Business Requirements
How do you cope with "abused users, overbooked users, comatose users, clueless users" and "know-it-all users" during the requirements-gathering stage of a data warehouse/BI project? Kimball group offers its advice for proactively working with (or around) the uncooperative, unavailable, uninsightful and irrepressible types who sometimes make it hard to know just what the business needs.
For nearly two decades, Kimball Group has stressed the importance of focusing on the business and its requirements for data warehouse/business intelligence success. We've provided specific requirements-gathering tips and techniques in previous articles and our Toolkit books, but what happens when things don't go according to plan? This article describes seven common challenges you may encounter during the requirements-gathering process along with Kimball Group's recommendations for overcoming these obstacles.
Uncooperative business executives and managers who claim "we already told IT what we want" are typically abused users. These folks have been interviewed repeatedly in the past for DW/BI initiatives but have yet to see anything result from their efforts. They are frustrated by past false starts and may even refuse to meet with a requirements team again.
You should proactively determine who was involved and interviewed in earlier DW/BI attempts. Any requirements documentation from the prior project should be reviewed. Unfortunately, documentation is seldom sufficient to take the place of a face-to-face meeting with the business representatives again. When scheduling meetings with these abused users, it's helpful to acknowledge their participation in previous efforts and let them know that you have already reviewed the resulting documentation. The new session can be presented as a validation, rather than as another back-to-the-beginning interview.
Naturally, users will resist rehashing previously covered territory, but they may be more willing to meet if you are focused on understanding current priorities. Finally, this is probably a good time to select an alternative forum for gathering requirements. If interviews were conducted previously, use the earlier requirements documentation as a baseline for a session focused on gather details on changes within their business.
These disengaged business users are simply too busy to meet anytime soon. They may agree to a scheduled time but then not show up or send a substitute in their place. An e-mail message from the program sponsor to all the participants about their importance to the initiative will often nip this disorder in the bud. However, if this is a contagious malady and executive management is unwilling or unable to address the condition, stop before you waste more effort. It's a safe bet that business users who don't have time to meet to share their requirements won't have time to attend education sessions and incorporate new information and analyses into their daily jobs, resulting in a never-ending, uphill struggle for the DW/BI team. Get off this slippery slope before further damage is done. You may be able to locate a more cooperative business partner elsewhere in your organization.
These business users respond to your classic, open-ended questions with monosyllabic, one-word responses. Fortunately, this is a relatively rare syndrome. Most often, their apathetic responses are due to external distractions totally unrelated to the DW/BI project. It's sometimes effective to ask these people questions from a more negative perspective. For example, rather than trying to get them to envision life outside the box, these users sometimes find it easier to tell you what's wrong inside the box.
If you have to pry information out of interviewees like this, it's senseless to prolong everyone's pain as these interviews quickly become no fun for anyone involved. Make a valiant attempt, but if it is still not working, abort the interview and schedule a replacement representative if the user is in a critical function or position.
The Agile ArchiveWhen it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
2014 Analytics, BI, and Information Management SurveyITís tried for years to simplify data analytics and business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.
Top IT Trends to Watch in Financial ServicesIT pros at banks, investment houses, insurance companies, and other financial services organizations are focused on a range of issues, from peer-to-peer lending to cybersecurity to performance, agility, and compliance. It all matters.
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of October 9, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week to get the "story behind the story."