Let business drivers, data volatility and project scope determine your approach and deployment style for master data management.
For a few years now, IT organizations have geared their optimization efforts toward infrastructure, process logic, and user interfaces. But focusing on data is the only way to achieve services-oriented IT. Here are four steps to determine if your company will benefit from a master data management initiative.
1. Rate yourself on the five attributes that predict your ability to profit from MDM:
>> Compliance and privacy obligations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and meaningful use.
>> Portfolios of broad, retail-oriented offerings that can benefit from cross- and up-selling.
>> Complex supplier network that can benefit from a consolidated view of transactions.
>> Multiple data entry and data transfer channels that require a centralized data quality and governance process, including activities related to data cleansing and authorization and validation.
>> A federated business services strategy based on service-oriented architecture that demands a complementary data services strategy.
2. Your principal business drivers dictate one of three main methods of use:
>> Collaborative MDM is aligned with the business process layer. It's used to manage entities whose attributes are owned and maintained by a diverse, yet interlinked, group of users.
>> Operational MDM is aligned with the services layer and works closely with the SOA stack.
>> Analytical MDM works on the side, with business intelligence applications to push out changes related to master data integrity.
3. Your data volatility determines the implementation style:
>> Registry style is a rudimentary implementation that provides read-only access to master data.
>> Coexistence style, where master data is refreshed periodically, works best in a nonvolatile environment.
>> Transaction style, where master data is always in sync with transactional systems, requires robust support for SOA, messaging, and transactional monitoring.
4. Your scope determines the number of domains needed:
>> Most initiatives include customer and product data domains, but businesses have been feeling the data pinch in other critical areas, including partners and suppliers, contracts, and locations and shipping.
>> MDM's scope is expanding to incorporate additional services, such as identity analytics and event management, and products that specialize in newer domains and niche verticals. Watch developments there.
--Sreedhar Kajeepeta (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Read the full analysis at informationweek.com/1286/mdmguide.
The Agile ArchiveWhen it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
2014 Analytics, BI, and Information Management SurveyITís tried for years to simplify data analytics and business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?