When Infrastructure Vendors Use Niche Products for Enterprise 2.0
What does it tell us when major infrastructure and enterprise content management vendors employ niche social computing products for some of their own projects? Oracle, Microsoft, Open Text and EMC are cases in point...
What does it tell us when major infrastructure and enterprise content management vendors employ niche social computing products for some of their own projects?
Some background: I participated in an interesting workshop at the recent 2.0 Council where one of the big debates was -- inevitably -- the tension between behemoth collaboration platforms (especially SharePoint) vs. point solutions for social computing behind the firewall. I'm sure that debate will recur at the Enterprise 2.0 Conference in Boston this week.It's an important debate, but one that yields few simple answers. I don't subscribe to the presently fashionable argument that platform vendors will rule the intranets of the future.
One interesting data point here is how many major software vendors use other (nominally competing) smaller vendors' products. Some examples:
Back when BEA was an independent company its developers used Atlassian's Confluence wiki (and I'd guess still do), despite the fact that their AquaLogic group had developed its own wiki package
Some Microsoft developers continued to use Telligent community software long after MOSS 2007 was released (perhaps they still do), while Redmond's "Office Live" team also employs Telligent for its public Workspace Community (including wiki and blog services)
Meanwhile, among big ECM vendors, Open Text's Social Media product team communicates via a Wordpress blog, and EMC is a large Jive customer internally.
I won't soft-pedal integration and other challenges associated with licensing point solutions, but there's a role for niche software on your intranet, extranet, or public communities when it gets the job done better than a larger, unified platform. Many platform vendors seem to agree.
Moreover, these comparisons and decisions hinge on more than just current feature sets. When customers who contribute to Real Story Group Enterprise 2.0 vendor evaluations tell us they prefer best-of-breed vendors, it's the smaller vendor's focus and ongoing commitment to that particular service that often come up as the most important rationale for their choice. In contrast, when is Microsoft going to upgrade SharePoint again? Not until 2013.
So, in social computing as in other market segments, there's no pat answer to suite vs. best-of-breed. I don't like saying "it depends" any more than you like hearing it, but... it really does depend on your situation.
Next steps: Get a Real Story Group free research sample or purchase complete vendor evaluations to obtain immediate access.What does it tell us when major infrastructure and enterprise content management vendors employ niche social computing products for some of their own projects? Oracle, Microsoft, Open Text and EMC are cases in point...
The Agile ArchiveWhen it comes to managing data, donít look at backup and archiving systems as burdens and cost centers. A well-designed archive can enhance data protection and restores, ease search and e-discovery efforts, and save money by intelligently moving data from expensive primary storage systems.
2014 Analytics, BI, and Information Management SurveyITís tried for years to simplify data analytics and business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.