ICANN's plan to expand available Internet addresses is finally coming to fruition. Learn more about the plusses and minuses of the new generic top-level domain names.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers' (ICANN's) long-running plan to dramatically expand the number of available generic top-level domain names, or gTLDs, should soon finally bear fruit. Then again, the real work for ICANN, domain registrars, businesses and other stakeholders is just getting started.
Today, there are 22 gTLDs -- the short string of characters to the right of the "dot" in Web addresses, like .com or .org -- available to the general public. ICANN, the governing body that oversees the public domain name system (DNS), approved a plan more than two years ago to increase by hundreds and likely thousands the number of available top-level domains. That would in turn exponentially increase the total number of available Internet addresses.
In the first major phase of the expansion, various organizations lined up to apply for ownership of new gTLDs. The cover charge wasn't cheap -- each application alone cost $185,000. Some applicants were domain name registrars with plans to sell Web addresses with the new suffixes, such as .inc or .web. Others were corporate behemoths like Amazon and Google that applied for gTLDs reflecting their brands, trademarks or other interests. Those applications were then evaluated on a variety of criteria, not the least of which was whether they were contested -- meaning there was more than one application for the same extension.
That phase is now complete and the first new publicly available gTLDs should begin hitting the market before the end of 2013, according to Akram Atallah, president of ICANN's generic domains division. That isn't guaranteed though, thanks to the operational and technical complexity involved in the wide-scale development of new Internet real estate.
"Of course, there are a lot of other issues that we're resolving as well that are holding up some of the applicants," Atallah said in an interview. Those include resolving concerns around GAC advice, for one -- feedback from the Governmental Advisory Committee on domains that may violate national laws or otherwise upset cultural sensitivities around the globe. And while some contested gTLDs were resolved by the applicants themselves, others remain disputed; Atallah said those will soon enter an auction phase to achieve final resolution.
Yet another issue is "name collision" -- the likelihood that some of the internal names that IT departments use in their company's private networks, such as .mail or .corp, will end up as public domains. That could cause security and stability issues: "These private namespaces sometimes 'leak' into the public DNS (either through misconfiguration or the use of old software), meaning that requests for resources on private networks could end up querying the public-facing DNS Root Servers and hence 'colliding' with the delegated new gTLD," ICANN said on its website.
There have been a host of other concerns, too: the potential for trademark and brand infringement, confusion among Internet users and the fairness of an application process that required $185,000 just to get in the door, as examples.
In other words: Massive development of new real estate isn't all that different online than in the physical world, where a mess of zoning rules, local, state and federal laws, neighbor disputes and other issues introduces regular headaches and slowdowns into the project.
Successful applicants will eventually have the new gTLD "delegated" to them for administration. At that point, ICANN is longer in direct control of how quickly, if ever, a domain will enter the "sunrise" phase -- a 30-day period prior to it going live in the public DNS. Certain suffixes, like .basketball, were applied for by organizations that will likely use them for their own purposes rather than sell addresses on the domain to the public. The .basketball applicant was the Federation Internationale de Basketball (FIBA), for example, the sport's international governing body. gTLDs such as .architect or .pizza were applied for by companies like Donuts.co, a venture-backed domain name registrar that will sell addresses on the new gTLDs at retail. ICANN received nearly 2,000 applications in all.
The expansion has had its detractors. Some businesses have expressed concerns about trademark and brand infringement once new domains begin entering the market on a regular basis. If you own MyBusinessName.com, for instance, what's to stop someone else from registering the same name at 50 new suffixes?
ICANN launched the Trademark Clearinghouse to mitigate that issue, though it charges fees for each registration. Atallah estimated it has received north of 10,000 entries to date and hailed it as a benefit of the new domain names.
"This new program puts in place a regime of protections for [trademark holders] that has not existed in the past," Atallah said. The clearinghouse effectively gives trademark holders first right of refusal to register any domain name that might infringe on their marks. It will also provide secondary defenses, such as automatically notifying registrants that the URL they're buying may violate someone else's trademark. "It's a very good system that the community put in place," Atallah added.
Google in the Enterprise SurveyThere's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
CIOs Get Smart About BIIT’s tried for years to simplify business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of April 17, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week!