Software // Operating Systems
Commentary
10/18/2012
01:56 PM
Charles Babcock
Charles Babcock
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Did OpenStack Let VMware Into The Henhouse?

VMware has paid its way onto the board of OpenStack, the open source alternative for enterprise cloud standards. Here's what OpenStack must do now.

OpenStack is the main initiative contesting VMware's growing dominance in running the enterprise cloud. OpenStack has both the momentum as an expanding open source project, and the right governance with the new OpenStack Foundation. It should be able to pose as a long-range alternative.

OpenStack provides the building blocks of cloud computing: compute, network, and storage management, with virtual machine provisioning built in. It has a monitoring/reporting system through its Horizon dashboard, plus image management in Glance. But it must compete with Amazon-compatible open source code from Eucalyptus Systems, and a more polished, OpenStack-like package in Apache's CloudStack, contributed by Citrix Systems.

OpenStack is off to a great start, but it will need something else as well: the ongoing commitment of many talented developers, including independent open source developers as well as those sponsored by large vendors. The momentum that it enjoys at the moment is from the backing of large companies. They're an impressive lot: Hewlett-Packard, AT&T, IBM, Rackspace, Dell, Intel, Cisco Systems, Juniper, Brocade, PayPal, and Yahoo, among others. But that backing is not enough.

OpenStack started with two founders: NASA and the cloud/hosted services vendor Rackspace. Rackspace didn't intend to become the primary sponsor, but NASA fell away as an active contributor as budget priorities during the recession drew personnel elsewhere. Rackspace emerged as the main sponsor--OpenStack meetings were hosted on Rackspace premises, and working groups tended to be led by Rackspace technical personnel. That's always a concern because true open source projects function indisputably above the interests of any one vendor.

[ Want to learn more about the open source alternatives to VMware? See Great Open Source Cloud Debate Rages. ]

The OpenStack Project has reasserted that independence with its new foundation. On Aug. 28, the new board of directors met and elected Alan Clark, director of new initiatives and cloud computing at SUSE, as its chairman, and Lew Tucker, CTO of cloud computing at Cisco, as vice chairman. That was not the beginning of the transition away from Rackspace, but the end. "It began last fall as representatives started moving toward a community-driven project," Tucker said.

Rackspace showed statesmanship in stepping back from its leadership role and turning over governance. That's also in Rackspace's interest as an early OpenStack implementer. If OpenStack catches on, Rackspace will have a better chance to compete with both Amazon's EC2 cloud infrastructure services and VMware's virtualization and management software.

The eight platinum supporters of OpenStack get a seat on the board of directors in exchange for ponying up $500,000 a year. That provides funds for full-time developers and an administrative staff of several people working with executive director Jonathan Bryce, originator of the Mosso cloud at Rackspace in 2006, which became the Rackspace Cloud in 2009. Rackspace offers infrastructure-as-a-service and led the market with low-cost, small-server options, encouraging early users. Bryce is a recognized pioneer in cloud computing.

The board further diversifies authority with eight gold members, elected from the current total of 13 gold memberships, plus eight elected community members out of a community that numbers 5,600.

The eight platinum members include IBM, Red Hat, Rackspace, HP, SUSE, Ubuntu, AT&T, and Nebula. Nebula, Rackspace, and HP all have significant cloud strategies that hinge on OpenStack code. Both Cisco and soon Red Hat will have their own distributions of OpenStack, while HP and Rackspace base their infrastructure-as-a-service offerings on the OpenStack code. Nebula offers a packaged version of OpenStack for running private clouds in the enterprise data center.

Gold members agree to support two or more full-time developers, whether from inside their company or outside. The 13 gold members include the Cloud Computing Association in Taiwan, Piston, Cisco, CloudScaling, Dell, DreamHost, Intel, Mirantis, MorphLabs, NEC, NetApp, VMware, and Yahoo. In addition, there are 25 corporate sponsors that each contribute $10,000 to $25,000 (startups get the lower end of the range). Beyond that, there are 850 companies and 5,600 individuals signed up as members of the project. All told, OpenStack has an initial $10 million to establish its more permanent development structure.

In one sense, platinum and gold memberships admit the influence of money--these financial contributors end up with 16 votes on a 24-member board. But their payments also put teeth into their promise to support ongoing development. A company that's not deeply committed to the basic goals of the project is unlikely to advance the $500,000 to become a platinum member.

The eight elected community members provide balance and an ability to referee any competing interests among the financial contributors, which include many competitors.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
JimDarraghAbiquo
50%
50%
JimDarraghAbiquo,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/22/2012 | 1:43:25 PM
re: Did OpenStack Let VMware Into The Henhouse?
VMwareG«÷s decision to join the OpenStack Foundation was a surprise to no one. The move is an attempt by the cloud giant to appear open and prove that it G«ˇgetsG«÷ how open source works and its benefits. VMware would like you to think that its interest is for the customer and not its own agenda. It wasnG«÷t so long ago that the creators of OpenStack shunned the crowd at VMware due to its proprietary, closed nature when it comes to managing the cloud. VMware has a long history of locking customers into its product range rather than letting companies choose what technologies they want in their clouds. When you pay for a VMware license you pay for lots of features that you may not even use. We've spoken to customers who were having to pay for the enterprise licensing because they canG«÷t live without one feature but the price difference between a standard and enterprise license is almost 300% - and theyG«÷re having to pay that just for one feature they need. Cloud services companies would be better served evaluating solutions that take advantage of the technology they already have and which avoid vendor lock-in. There are cloud management platforms available now that are safe, secure, and interoperable with multiple hypervisors and heterogeneous infrastructure.

Jim Darragh, CEO, Abiquo
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.