Software // Operating Systems
Commentary
8/24/2012
11:02 AM
Paul McDougall
Paul McDougall
Commentary
50%
50%

Why Microsoft Should Use Its Nvidia Option

Nvidia this week confirmed that its acquisition deal with Microsoft remains in effect. Steve Ballmer and company should jump at the chance.

Last year I reported that Microsoft has a deal that gives it the right to match any takeover offer for Nvidia. The chipmaker this week confirmed in an SEC filing that the pact is still active. Microsoft should pull the trigger if it wants to ensure the success of Windows 8.

From Nvidia's 10-Q filing this week. "If an individual or corporation makes an offer to purchase shares equal to or greater than 30% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, Microsoft may have first and last rights of refusal to purchase the stock." The agreement is a holdover from Nvidia's days as an Xbox component supplier.

Redmond shouldn't wait until someone else makes an offer. It's getting more difficult for Microsoft to make money on software that runs PCs, laptops, and mobile devices. And it's only going to get tougher.

Demand for traditional computers is falling as consumers and workers opt for tablets and smartphones. Windows 8 and Windows Phone represent Microsoft's acknowledgement that it needs to play in those markets. But third-party hardware that carries either of those operating systems won't likely be price competitive.

Tablets running open-source Google Android can sell for as little as $99 because their makers don't have to pay a fee for the OS. But devices that run Windows Phone and Windows 8 will have the so-called Microsoft tax built in. By some estimates, that's as much as $30 per device or more.

The only mobile player immune to this problem is Apple. It has its own hardware, chips, and OS, and thus isn't at the mercy of partners' prices. How Apple accounts for component costs internally is its own mystery. But it seems to be working.

Microsoft needs to adopt the Apple model. Hawking software licenses to OEMs with razor-thin margins isn't going to, ahem, cut it. Especially when those OEMs have a free alternative that's more popular than anything Redmond currently offers.

There's a big sign that Microsoft gets this. The company has announced plans to produce its own tablet, Surface, in two versions--one that runs Windows RT and one that runs Windows 8 Professional.

[ Want more details on both operating systems? See Windows 8 Vs. Windows RT: 8 Key Differences. ]

Surface RT will use Microsoft-designed hardware running Microsoft software. If Microsoft exercises its option to acquire Nvidia, it would also own the processor. Surface RT uses Nvidia's hot-selling Tegra 3 chip.

With Nvidia in the fold, Microsoft could also give Google some headaches. Google's Jelly Bean-based Nexus 7 is powered by Tegra 3, which can also be found in the HTC One X and Fujitsu's Arrow X, which I hear is big in Japan.

The benefits that Nvidia would bring to Microsoft don't stop at mobile. Nvidia bills its Kepler graphics processing unit as "the first GPU for cloud computing", and it supports the kind of enterprise VDI scenarios that Microsoft wants to facilitate through its Windows Server 8 Hyper-V virtualization engine.

The chipmaker would also give Microsoft more ammunition for the tech industry's patent wars. Nvidia has about 4,500 patents or patents pending, and it picked up about 500 key wireless patents through a deal in May involving Intellectual Ventures.

Finally, Nvidia would give Microsoft a bigger presence in the lucrative supercomputing market. Its Tesla GPU is found in three of the world's top five supercomputers, including NCSA's Blue Waters, which can sustain performance at 1 petaflop. Nvidia, to boot, is highly profitable, posting $119 million in net income in the most recent quarter. And its coffers are full. Nvidia sits on $3.28 billion in cash and equivalents.

Microsoft originally attained right of first refusal on Nvidia as part of a deal that saw Nvidia become the a GPU supplier for the Xbox. The irony is that Nvidia no longer makes chips for the console--but its present value to Microsoft runs far beyond that.

At this year's InformationWeek 500 Conference, C-level execs will gather to discuss how they're rewriting the old IT rulebook and accelerating business execution. At the St. Regis Monarch Beach, Dana Point, Calif., Sept. 9-11.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Andrew Hornback
50%
50%
Andrew Hornback,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/27/2012 | 2:16:43 AM
re: Why Microsoft Should Use Its Nvidia Option
I doubt that this will ever happen...

Let's look at the Supercomputing market for a minute. What's the basic operating system that runs on the big iron like Blue Waters? Linux, unless I'm seriously mistaken. So, Microsoft would put itself in a position to be powering some of the most powerful installations in the world, but would not have an operating system capable of running on them? That sounds like a PR nightmare waiting to happen.

Let's look at it from another perspective - Microsoft starts growing itself as a hardware producer and following the Apple paradigm. Suddenly, you're presented with the idea of two of the largest tech giants in the world creating their own monopolistic utopias: Apple products only run properly with other Apple products and Microsoft products only run properly with other Microsoft products. I'm thinking DoJ involvement, I'm thinking anti-trust filings... I'm thinking this won't happen...

Unless Microsoft agrees to divest portions of nVidia upon the purchase of the company, and even then, that could get very, VERY sticky for Redmond.

Andrew Hornback
InformationWeek Contributor
S. Kyle Davis
50%
50%
S. Kyle Davis,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/26/2012 | 3:30:41 PM
re: Why Microsoft Should Use Its Nvidia Option
And what about Intel? Intel is one of Microsoft's biggest champions and best partners. Perhaps Intel's ultrabook campaign hasn't saved the PC, but it has been a huge stopgap. I don't see this happening. Sorry.
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Ninja
8/26/2012 | 1:54:04 PM
re: Why Microsoft Should Use Its Nvidia Option
Putting out a bid is not the same as using the option. MS can only use the option if someone else is offering and since there are no offers on the table this is a moot point. Besides that, buying only nVidia will only provide for a fraction of stuff MS would need to get heavily into the hardware business. Given how many challenges Dell, HP, and AMD face, doing hardware on a scale that Microsoft would need is tough. In order to make it worthwhile Microsoft would need to not only buy nVidia, but also a manufacturer with established distribution channels such as Acer or Asus. I don't see that happening any time.
Nash1945
50%
50%
Nash1945,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/24/2012 | 11:47:37 PM
re: Why Microsoft Should Use Its Nvidia Option
It makes sense, but it'll never happen. It's CEO, Jen-Hsun Huang, will never let anyone else take control of his baby. He founded the company. Unlike other tech start-ups, Nvidia WAS NOT built with the goal of getting bought out. The clause was left there to as a poison pill which serves both MS's and Huang's interests.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 14, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.