State Department Hack Escalates Federal Data Insecurity
The reported break-in of the State Department's network raises national security concerns.
Reports of a hack into U.S. State Department IT systems raises concerns about data security in the federal government to a whole new level. Unlike the laptop thefts that have plagued the Veterans Affairs and Agriculture departments, Federal Trade Commission, and Internal Revenue Service in recent months but gave thieves access to a finite amount of information, the State Department faces the daunting task of clearing up a breach that reportedly gave attackers access to data and passwords that could open the door to future attacks.
The June computer break-ins and subsequent discovery limited Internet access at many State Department locations, including its Washington headquarters, and inside the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, the Associated Press reported Wednesday. Word of the attacks comes at a particularly delicate time for the State Department, which has been involved in critical diplomatic negotiations with North Korea following that country's testing of nuclear missiles earlier this month.
The idea that government-held data could be breached as the result of an attack rather than the negligence of government workers is a sobering thought and one not addressed by the multitude of hearings and proclamations that followed in the wake of the May theft of a Veterans Affairs laptop and hard drive containing more than 26.5 million records. "With the State Department, we could be talking about classified information, not just personally identifiable data," says Paul Kurtz, executive director of the Cyber Security Industry Alliance.
There are different types of data breaches and, as a result, a need to react with different levels of concern. When a laptop is stolen, the laptop's owner can usually console themselves with the thought that the data on the device was not the target of the theft. If the thief does access the data on the stolen device, IT shops can determine the contents of that device and have a good idea of what they're up against.
But the State Department's breach is much more troubling. "This is by far worse than the loss of one laptop, even if it had 26 million names on it," says Gartner VP and fellow John Pescatore. The State Department has to figure out what's been stolen from its systems and whether that information was used to access government networks and plant malicious software such as rootkits, which could make subsequent attacks easier. "It's hard enough to remove rootkits from one server, never mind several servers," he adds.
The State Department has a less-than-stellar record when it comes to IT security. In March, the White House Office of Management and Budget's annual federal government computer security report card gave the State Department an F grade for fiscal 2005, even worse that its D+ grade for fiscal 2004. The overall grade given to all 24 federal agencies evaluated was a D+.
As details of the attack against the State Department surface, the incident brings to mind the October 2000 hack against Microsoft, where an intruder had access to the company's corporate network for 12 days. Microsoft security employees discovered the break-in near the end of that month after they found that internal passwords were being siphoned to an E-mail address in St. Petersburg, Russia.
The Business of Going DigitalDigital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
What The Business Really Thinks Of IT: 3 Hard TruthsThey say perception is reality. If so, many in-house IT departments have reason to worry. InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. The news isn't great.