Judge Finds Microsoft To Be A Monopoly

A federal court judge has determined that Microsoft holds a monopoly in the computer software industry, setting the stage for a possible legal verdict against the software company that dominates desktop computing.

District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson today issued findings of fact that state Microsoft has used its monopoly power to engage in predatory actions against competitors and that consumers suffered as a result. While Jackson's findings are not a verdict in the year-old antitrust case brought against Microsoft by the federal government and 19 state attorneys general, Jackson's statements in the 207-page report are seen as highly unfavorable to Microsoft.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Government attorneys had argued that Microsoft holds a monopoly in PC operating systems and has acted illegally to extend that monopoly into other markets, particularly Internet browser software. After hearing further arguments from both sides, Jackson will decide whether these facts prove Microsoft violated antitrust laws. If so, the software company could face sanctions that range from fines to legal restrictions on its actions to a court-ordered breakup of the company.

"Microsoft has demonstrated that it will use its prodigious market power and immense profits to harm any firm that insists on pursuing initiatives that could intensify competition against one of Microsoft's core products," Jackson wrote. Under U.S. law, it is not illegal to establish monopoly power through skill or superior products, but it is illegal to use that dominance to hold or extend the monopoly.

Government officials called the ruling "a tremendous victory for America's consumers."


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links