Risk Management Firm Bets On Social Business
By David F. Carr
InformationWeek
"The majority of the money and time my team spent was focused on change management and adoption, not the technology," Brooks said in an interview. As SVP and global director of enterprise communications and colleague engagement, Brooks championed the project in partnership with Laurie Ledford, chief human resources officer of parent company Marsh & McLennan.
When the project started in late 2009 to January 2010, the strategy wasn't necessarily explicitly a "social" one, Brooks said. "In a more conservative industry like insurance, social was not the hot thing, what everyone was doing. On the other hand, collaboration was something everyone at our firm understands." Some of the technical decisions made then are ripe to be revisited because the market for social software has matured, Brooks said. But what's more important is that the organization is ready to take advantage of them, he said.
"Three years ago, the conversation was more around if we should do social media. 'Do we need this?' The conversation now is how to do it. Meanwhile, we've built the muscle memory of our colleagues to share online, which is a huge organizational development and behavioral change. We've already upgraded a number of things in the IT environment. But the point is, regardless of whatever technology we might choose for a better user experience, we're now ready for what the market has," Brooks said.
The social business payoff doesn't necessarily show up in one neat return on investment number, but corporate initiatives that take advantage of the social environment consistently prove to be more successful than those that do not, he said. Participation is also climbing. This year, Marsh saw a 300% increase in the number of employees coming to the site on a daily basis.
[ Looking for something? Read Social Media Search: How To Find It.]
In some cases, social sharing is credited with helping Marsh win new business, Brooks said. "In one case, we had a client in Turkey that had a risk, but the markets we typically use for risk in London were essentially saturated." The frustrated broker aired his dilemma on the internal social network and connected with a colleague who asked, "'Have you tried the Hamburg market?' As a result, we ended up working a deal we otherwise wouldn't have been able to execute," he said.
Creating the opportunity for people to share ideas their colleagues might not have considered is a fundamental part of the value of a corporate social network, Brooks said. "With 25,000 people, you have to get them to introduce themselves to each other -- it's a way of making a big company feel like a much smaller place."
Marsh University has been cited recently in the Software Advice blog (thanks to that blog's Kyle Lagunas for the introduction) and an HR Executive cover story. Marsh was also recognized in the 2011 InformationWeek 500, partly because of the Marsh University project.
Marsh University is not really a "university" or even a formal online learning environment but a social tool designed for knowledge sharing and communications. The name "Marsh University" is one Brooks inherited from a corporate strategy exercise aimed at reinvigorating the organization, conducted before he was put in charge of the project. As part of a corporate strategy initiative known as Ignite, Marsh established several goals and "one of them was to create a, quote unquote, 'Marsh University' -- even though no one knew what that meant," Brooks said. "Our challenge was to figure out what we could do creatively with a fairly modest investment of resources. Everything had to be funded from internal savings."
Rather than building on an enterprise social networking suite, Marsh partnered with a startup, Red Rover, that helped cobble together a solution including components like WordPress blogging software, Box file sharing, Kaltura for corporate video sharing, and Red Rover's own software for microblogging, member profiles and group discussions. Microblog posts are known as Sparks on Marsh University, a reference to the Ignite strategy for corporate culture. David F. Carr is Editor of The BrainYard, the community for social business on InformationWeek.com, covering social media and the new generation of enterprise collaboration technologies.
Federal agencies must eliminate 800 data centers over the next five years. Find how they plan to do it in the new all-digital issue of InformationWeek Government. Download it now (registration required).

Marsh University and its Spark microblogging tool.
1 | 2 | Next Page »
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
InformationWeek Reports
Cloud Implementer's Checklist
Once your agency has completed the business case for a private cloud, how do you actually move ahead with your data center transformation? Our report provides a practical set of steps to get you there, including a "to do" list that will be helpful to anyone on your IT team who's involved in the project. By the time you're done, your data center should be home to a more flexible, on-demand IT services.
Cloud Compliance in Government
Compute clouds created for government data centers must adhere to a range of specifications designed to support data and system security, privacy, and governance. FISMA, HIPAA, SOX, and SAS 70 are just some of the requirements that have to be taken into account as federal IT pros deploy a shared-services cloud model. In this report, we identify the key specs that need to be factored into any federal cloud architecture.
Government Cloud Platform Strategy
This report analyzes the key IT infrastructure considerations that must be taken into account for implementing cloud services in federal data centers: software/hardware environment, multi-tenancy, security, virtualization, and management tools. We also explain the key important role that APIs play in supporting hybrid scenarios that tap into public cloud services.
The Business Case for Government Clouds
This report assesses usage scenarios, barriers, and other variables that factor into the decision of whether and how to implement cloud computing in federal environments.




Subscribe to RSS