The Virtualized Backup Gap
By George Crump
InformationWeek
Depending on which study you read, most data centers are less that 50% virtualized. That means that more than half of the server population is still basically a single application running on a single physical server. In my experience, many of these servers are often not virtualized because they run some mission-critical application that is resource intensive and there is concern about placing that application in the highly shared virtual environment.
While legacy backup systems are gaining some of the features that virtualization-specific backup products have, they still lag in this area. At the same time, most of the virtualization-specific applications do not provide important legacy capabilities like complete application protection, robust data retention and tape support.
The result is customers end up running at least two backup applications in their environment. In fact, even in 100% virtualized environments, we have seen many data centers running two applications -- virtualization-specific backup for day to day protection and a legacy application to be able to create a robust archive of the virtual environment as well as to get a copy of it on tape.
The Solution To The Backup Gap
Running two or more separate backup applications to meet the needs of the enterprise is not looked on as ideal. As we discussed in a recent webinar "What's Breaking Enterprise Backup and How to Fix it", there are three viable ways to address the gap in capabilities of virtualized and non-virtualized products.
First, you can choose to wait for the virtualization backup software to add legacy features like protecting non-virtual machines and providing support for tape libraries. Second, you can choose to wait for legacy backup applications to add the features that have made virtualization-specific backup applications so popular. Finally, you can choose to wait for legacy backup applications to develop an API-like capability that would allow VM specific backup applications to plug into their enterprise features.
As you can see each of these options require some form of waiting -- but several vendors are closing the gap. We have seen several virtualization-specific backup applications add support for non-virtualized systems and a few have announced plans for tape support. We have also seen many of the enterprise backup applications add features that were once only available from virtualization specific backup applications. You can talk to these vendors to see what is available now and what their roadmaps look like and get a sense of who can get you to a single backup strategy the soonest.
The third option, the API or modularization approach, makes the most sense for the long term. As we discussed in our recent article "Enterprise Backup is Broken", backup software vendors have to come to the realization that no one vendor can do it all. The data center would be much better off if legacy enterprise backup systems allowed smaller point products to integrate into their legacy capabilities. We would have unified and best of breed data protection at the same time.
In my next column I'll discuss how -- if backup software vendors are not careful -- the disk backup appliance may end up being the central point of consolidation. Already today multiple backup applications can send data to a single disk backup appliance and disk backup appliance vendors are very focused on providing tighter integration with a broad range of backup software solutions.
Federal agencies must eliminate 800 data centers over the next five years. Find how they plan to do it in the new all-digital issue of InformationWeek Government. Download it now (registration required).
Our four business scenarios show how to improve disaster recovery, boost disk utilization and speed performance. Also in the new, all-digital Storage Virtualization Gets Real issue of InformationWeek SMB: While Intel remains the biggest manufacturer of chips in the world, the next few years will prove vexing for the company. (Free registration required.)
 |
To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Subscribe to RSSVirtual Infrastructure Reports
Informed CIO: VDI Snake Oil Check
You won't lose your shirt on a desktop virtualization initiative, but don't expect it to be simple to build or free of complications. This report examines the three biggest problems when developing a business case for VDI: storage costs, ongoing licensing, and the wisdom of prolonging the investment in PC infrastructure.
Fundamentals: Next-Generation VM Security
Server virtualization creates new security threats while turning the hypervisor into a network black hole, hiding traffic from traditional hardware defenses -- problems a new breed of virtualization-aware security software tackles head-on.
Delegation Delivers Virtualization Savings
IT can't-and shouldn't-maintain absolute control over highly virtualized infrastructures. Instituting a smart role-based control strategy to decentralize management can empower business units to prioritize their own data assets while freeing IT to focus on the next big project.
The Zen of Virtual Maintenance
Server virtualization has many advantages, but it can also lead to chaos. Many organizations have unused or test VMs running on production systems that consume memory, disk and power. This means critical resources may not be available in an emergency: say, when VMs on a failed machine try to move to another server. This can contribute to unplanned downtime and raise maintenance costs. Easy deployment also means business units may come knocking with more demands for applications and services. This report offers five steps to help IT get a handle on their virtual infrastructure.
Pervasive Virtualization: Time to Expand the Paradigm
Extending core virtualization concepts to storage, networking, I/O and application delivery is changing the face of the modern data center. In this Fundamentals report, we'll discuss all these areas in the context of four main precepts of virtualization.
Virtually Protected: Key Steps To Safeguarding Your VM Disk Files
We provide best practices for backing up VM disk files and building a resilient infrastructure that can tolerate hardware and software failures. After all, what's the point of constructing a virtualized infrastructure without a plan to keep systems up and running in case of a glitch--or outright disaster.