If you're expanding your network or building one from scratch, there's plenty to watch out for. Here are the five biggest mistakes you should avoid.
If it is human to err, then it is almost inevitable that any network conceived by human intelligence and built by human hands is going to have problems. Mistakes happen, and they can range from the downright disastrous to the mildly infuriating. The good news, according to Forester Research analyst Robert Whiteley, is that organizations have gotten good enough at their networks that disasters are comparatively rare.
That doesn't mean that organizations don't commit a few blunders along the way, but the no-nos are more a question of having a network operate below expectations than one that doesn't function at all. "There's a difference between a network that just works and one that can support new applications," he says. "So mistakes aren't really so binary. They're just things that make work harder than it should be."
It is, of course, a whole lot easier to avoid the five top network no-nos when you're starting with a clean slate, but few organizations have that luxury. With network expansion, however, Whiteley says that it's possible for companies to at least not make mistakes that they've made before. "You don't see many greenfield builds anymore," he says. "But we get a lot of questions about things like cabling, probably because companies are building data centers, so there are pockets of network design where you can get things right, right from the start."
With that in mind, there are a whole range of things organizations can do to achieve better living through networking, and they all come down to avoiding common mistakes. These are the top five:
1. Ignoring network management tools: "People often forget about management tools when they're building a new network or looking at the one they have," Whiteley says. "Most hardware vendors provide management software with their products these days, but there is a whole tier of software that can give visibility into the network as a whole."
The bottom line is that, without sniffers (software that intercepts and analyzes network traffic) and software to bind the whole management process together, you'll be running your network blind. For networks to operate at their optimal level, you need to be able to see things like traffic patterns, and though network management tools can be added after the build, companies rarely budget for the additional expense.
"There are ways to reduce you operational burden if you do it from the beginning," Whiteley says. "The no-no is not planning or budgeting for it."
2. Inefficient wireless network design: With the growing ubiquity of wireless local area networks (WLANs) in organizations around the globe, this can be a common issue. The good news is that, with no cables to pull, it's a problem that can be fixed. WLANs grew originally as convenient overlays to wired networks, but increasingly, they're being deployed as extensions of existing networks, and that makes design even more important.
Wireless networking carries its own security and architectural baggage that must be addressed if its going to be an effective part of the network, rather than a drag on efficiency. "Companies didn't originally think about these things in the design stage," Whiteley says. "One thing you see now is companies that simply have a blanket 'no wireless policy,' but that's risky. Someone can bring in a rogue Linksys router if he feels this is something he needs, but the company won't do."
Even if you're not investing in wireless as a priority technology, you still need to address it before your employees address it themselves. "The no-no is simply avoiding or dismissing wireless -- because you can't," Whitely says. "You might have a negative stance, but you have to have a policy."
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?