The mobile virtual network operator launches mobile IM service that initiates packetized voice calls.
VoIP takes advantage lots of hybrids and variations, and now wireless mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Tokiva has added instant messaging on mobiles to the mix as a way to initiate a packetized voice call.
The Toronto-based operator said Monday that its IM-To-Call service is available immediately on leading IM clients, including MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, AOL Messenger, and Google Talk. Its general availability follows a beta test that began in January, Tokiva said in a statement.
Users don't need to download any software to make wireless VoIP calls. Registered users receive an invitation to add Tokiva as a buddy on their IM lists, and then send an instant message to Tokiva to call. Tokiva calls back, either to the user's landline or mobile phone, then immediately connects the caller to the desired number.
"Using Tokiva can save up to 90% of normal call costs," the MVNO claimed, "because the calls are carried by Tokiva's global VoIP network that has a footprint in over 185 countries."
Tokiva said its customers also tend to be heavy users of IM, so that the Tokiva IM-To-Call service is a natural extension to what they are already doing. "Tokiva is connecting text-based IM systems with voice-based phone networks in a simple yet powerful way," said Tong Li, founder and chief executive of Tokiva.
According to figures from ComScore Media, there are 90 million instant messaging users in the United States. By the second quarter of 2008, Tokiva said it plans to support QQ Messenger, the most popular IM systems in China, which counts 520 million users.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?