Nokia releases its browser tools to open source community, and .mobi registration begins.
When it comes to browsing the Web on mobile devices, there's one defining characteristic: It's completely inadequate.
Events last week show two approaches to solving that problem. One was Nokia's release of the code behind its mobile phone browser to the open source development community. The other saw companies starting to register their Web sites under the .mobi suffix, a domain designed for the mobile Internet.
Nokia, by releasing the source code for its S60 WebKit, is trying to rally mobile browser developers behind its platform, reducing market fragmentation. "If developers have to support 10 different browsers across multiple devices and operating systems, it's a problem," says Lee Epting, VP of Forum Nokia, the company's software developer program.
Can you see me now? Good.
On a modern phone, the S60 mobile browser can render Web pages as they appear to PC users, albeit smaller. The browser isn't forced to rely on specially designed mobile-friendly pages. Competing browsers such as Opera Mobile can do this, too.
The philosophy behind the browser is to let people access the same existing Web sites whether they're using a mobile phone or a PC.
The .mobi strategy takes the opposite tack: that companies will alter their sites to work with mobile phones, and that mobile phone users will seek out .mobi sites. Starting last week, members of mobile industry associations could register their domain names, and starting June 12 trademark owners can register.
Criticisms of the .mobi approach are that it devalues existing domains and that other efforts to expand beyond the .com suffix haven't taken off.
Nokia, like most tech companies, is supporting both efforts. It doesn't care how we get to a better mobile Web experience--just that it gets good enough that you buy a new phone to do it
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?