U.S. Government Signs Off On Patent Disclosure Plan
Disclosure of a patent holder's most restrictive licensing terms will increase competition by allowing standards groups to choose among technologies on licensing as well as technical terms, proponents say.
WASHINGTON U.S. antitrust enforcers have signed off on a proposal by an computer industry standards group to disclose and license patents.
In a statement Monday (Oct. 30), the Justice Department's Antitrust Division said VTIA's patent proposal would enable it "to make better informed decisions and thereby formulate standards that will benefit consumers."
VITA requested legal guidance, known as a business review letter, from DoJ on its proposal. In the letter, Thomas Barnett, head of the Antitrust Division, said VITA's proposed licensing policy "should preserve, not restrict, competition among patent holders." Disclosure of a patent holder's most restrictive licensing terms will increase competition by enabling standards groups to choose among technologies on licensing as well as technical terms, Barnett added.
In a statement, Ray Alderman, executive director of VITA, said: "This has been an effort for reform that is long overdue in the world of technology-specification development."
Standards groups have become increasingly concerned about their deliberations in the aftermath of the government's antitrust case against intellectual property provider Rambus Inc. The Rambus case focused on requirements for disclosing memory technology patents during standard debates. One concern is that patent holders will try to "game" the standards process to gain competitive advantage.
5 Top Federal Initiatives For 2015As InformationWeek Government readers were busy firming up their fiscal year 2015 budgets, we asked them to rate more than 30 IT initiatives in terms of importance and current leadership focus. No surprise, among more than 30 options, security is No. 1. After that, things get less predictable.
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of April 24, 2016. We'll be talking with the InformationWeek.com editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week!