Enterasys Networks and Lucent Technologies introduced a package of services designed to improve the security of IP telephony networks.
As more businesses large and small begin to deploy IP telephone technology, there's a growing need to provide better security as voice calls travel over data networks like E-mail. Two major telecom vendors -- Enterasys Networks and Lucent Technologies -- on Wednesday introduced a package of services designed to improve the security of IP telephony services.
Enterasys will resell Lucent's suite of Bell Labs-developed security assessment and consulting services, and VoIP readiness assessment. The two vendors also will offer voice-over-IP consulting services.
The services will analyze the ROI of security investments, provide a snapshot of how security policies are being implemented and how they can be improved, test a network's ability to fend off attacks, set up a security event-management system, assess the ability of a network to handle the added traffic generated by voice calls, and suggest modifications to better prepare the network.
IP telephony is becoming a target for hackers and distributors of malicious software, partly because businesses are doing a better job of securing their data networks. "VoIP security is brand new, but customers who want IP telephony should implement it with their eyes wide open," says Jon Oltsik, an analyst at The Enterprise Strategy Group Inc. "This Enterasys/Lucent service could help them."
The first products to be certified under the vendors' Secure Networks program are Lucent's voice over IP products, which provide IP telephony services as a hosted service or using equipment at a customer's location.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?