Cloud // Cloud Storage
News
7/22/2010
04:34 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Violating Web Site Rules Not A Crime

But a California district court judge's ruling leaves open the question of whether bypassing IP blocking is a criminal act.

A U.S. District Court judge on Tuesday ruled that it's not a criminal act to violate the Terms of Service of a Web site, a decision hailed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The case, Facebook v. Power Ventures, arose because Power offered software that allowed users to aggregate Facebook friends and other data with similar sets of data from other social networking sites.

Facebook argued that because its Terms of Service forbid users from using automated methods to access user data, Power's software violated California's computer crime law, specifically section 502(c).

Section 502(c) prohibits access to computers or information that a person is not authorized to access.

The EFF filed an amicus brief arguing that any Terms of Service violation should be treated as a civil contract dispute rather than a crime. Criminal penalties, such as imprisonment, are generally more severe than civil penalties, such as fines.

"We argued that turning any violation of terms of use into a crime would give Web sites unfettered power to decide what conduct is criminal, leaving millions of Internet users vulnerable to prosecution for everyday activities," explained EFF attorney Marcia Hoffman in an online post.

But the judge was more receptive to another argument made by Facebook. The social networking site took steps to block Power's IP address to prevent its software from gathering Facebook user data, but Power changed its IP address to avoid being blocked.

This could be a crime, if such activity is considered to be circumventing a technological protection measure.

The EFF contends that such blocking should only be considered criminal if it's truly harmful and those involved intended such harm.

"There's nothing inherently wrong or unlawful about avoiding IP address blocking, and there are valid reasons why someone might choose to do so, including to sidestep anticompetitive behavior by other Internet services," said Hoffman.

Hoffman said the EFF intends to follow the case and hopes the judge will recognize the difficulties of treating the avoidance of IP address blocking as a crime rather than a contractual dispute.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Google in the Enterprise Survey
Google in the Enterprise Survey
There's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity ­products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent ­mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers ­distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest September 18, 2014
Enterprise social network success starts and ends with integration. Here's how to finally make collaboration click.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
The weekly wrap-up of the top stories from InformationWeek.com this week.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.