Based on a continuously updated threats database, VoIPaudit is promised to be both comprehensive and highly scalable.
VoIPshield Systems Inc. has just launched a new voice over IP (VoIP) vulnerability assessment solution that will allow organizations to respond to threats before they affect IP telephony systems and services.
Based on a continuously updated threats database, VoIPaudit is both comprehensive and highly scalable. It can be set to scan continuously or periodically and provides support for a wide range of VoIP protocols, including session initiation protocol (SIP), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) H.323, Cisco Skinny, Nortel Unistim, and other proprietary protocols. VoIPaudit also support wireless VoIP services IMS and dual mode mobile phones.
According to VoIPshield, VoIPaudit features and easy-to-use interface with a range of analysis and reporting tools. Its reporting features allow use to do a complete vulnerability analysis or produce a quick security summary.
"Ours is the first security solution which can not only address the complexity of voice deployments, but secure the VoIP network at the systems level," VoIPshield Systems CEO C. Paul Slaby said in a statement. "VoIPaudit is designed to meet the unique requirements of enterprises and service providers deploying VoIP. Voice communications are critical and VoIPaudit offers an unprecedented level of intelligence and security assessment for all the equipment and devices in the VoIP network."
VoIPaudit is available now at prices starting at $10,000. The solution includes training and support.
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?