What Does The HIPAA 'Marketing' Provision Mean To Consumers?
How do you feel about your pharmacist or physician maybe being paid to have others send you marketing messages or drug promotions?
While many consumer and privacy advocacy groups have been vocal about the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act's marketing rules, the consumer pick-up has been minimal. How do you feel about your pharmacist or physician perhaps being paid to have others send you marketing messages or drug promotions? Does it make any difference if they can do it under your pharmacist's or physician's name? Are you worried that your pharmacy might be sending you alternative drug-therapy recommendations without informing your physician? Or does the convenience of learning about alternative therapies or being reminded to renew your prescriptions outweigh your concerns?
Do you trust a contractor who has entered into an agreement not to divulge your personal health information not to betray that trust? Do you trust them more than if the drug manufacturer itself had possession of that information and agreed not to share it further?
Did you even know about this practice? I didn't. When I first learned about The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse's litigation (see "Albertsons Sued Over Customer-Data Privacy ), I was appalled that a drugstore chain would market to their customers, allowing the drug manufacturers to deliver their messages couched as the pharmacists themselves. I was certain that HIPAA covered this and started making some phone calls to health-care privacy experts I knew. That's when I found out about the changes in the HIPAA rules since I had last researched this issue. The more I learned, the more shocked I became. After a careful review of what was going on, I decided I still wasn't happy about receiving unsolicited marketing material--of any kind. (Interestingly enough, the younger generation appears less shocked: my 25-year old daughter says she's not surprised to see a pharmacy behaving as a retail provider engaged in marketing efforts, rather than as a health-care provider.)
Yes, I would like to get a reminder of a prescription refill, or suggestions about new medications or treatment options. But I want to know that my health-care personal information is secure and private--that it's not being shared with marketers. I also want to know that any communications I receive from my physician or health-care provider are based on my best interests, not how much they're paid to market products and services to me.
So, is this a privacy issue? Or is this a fiduciary and professional level-of-care issue? You decide. But the more we know about how things work, the more we can make that decision for ourselves. It makes the difference between throwing these communications in the trash or acting on them. You decide.
IT's Reputation: What the Data SaysInformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business really views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. Our results suggest IT leaders should worry less about whether they're getting enough resources and more about the relationships they have with business unit peers.
What The Business Really Thinks Of IT: 3 Hard TruthsThey say perception is reality. If so, many in-house IT departments have reason to worry. InformationWeek's IT Perception Survey seeks to quantify how IT thinks it's doing versus how the business views IT's performance in delivering services - and, more important, powering innovation. The news isn't great.
InformationWeek Must Reads Oct. 21, 2014InformationWeek's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of digital strategy. Learn why you should learn to embrace DevOps, how to avoid roadblocks for digital projects, what the five steps to API management are, and more.