Cloud // Cloud Storage
Commentary
7/30/2012
06:15 PM
Jasmine  McTigue
Jasmine McTigue
Commentary
50%
50%

Why Hasn't Hyper-V Achieved World Domination Yet?

Microsoft is falling down on its patented copy/embed/propaganda formula. Where's Bill Gates when you need him?

Despite ongoing innovation by seated virtualization giant VMware, Microsoft continues to match core hypervisor features while competing strongly on price. No surprise, then, that Hyper-V is gaining market share. But I must confess that I'm a bit disappointed in Redmond's performance, in light of its track record for mercilessly crushing the competition, even in established markets where it previously held no competency.

It seems to me that Microsoft is not effectively applying its tried-and-true formula for seizing dominance. And that's a problem for IT, because the lack of a single industry-standard hypervisor platform is hurting the market from a standards and interoperability perspective.

Sure, competition is healthy; it drives down prices and fosters innovation. However, where server virtualization is concerned, how much innovation do we really need? VMware may have more or less invented the business-class server hypervisor, but Microsoft always wins these battles in the end. And honestly, isn't that a good thing? Businesses get a tolerable product that takes a ton of effort to keep running but is relatively inexpensive, so they can spend on expertise. Vendors get a standard platform on which to build and develop. Equipment manufacturers get a standard OEM hypervisor to deploy. And on a more personal front, we IT pros get excellent job security and the privilege of paying for expensive outsourced single-vendor technical support conducted in broken English. Not only that, but it's nice to have only one product to support, am I right? All these different hypervisors fragment staff expertise by requiring skilled professionals to handle different systems. When people ask IT about products Microsoft has killed (remember WordPerfect?) our response is simple: No one uses that, why should I know it well enough to support it? You're on your own, user!

So where has Microsoft fallen down on the job? Let's take a look at the formula and see why VMware is still around.

First, Microsoft enters into a lucrative market with established players by producing a copycat product and pricing it aggressively. Check. Second, it slipstreams the new offering into the Windows product line so that it's "built in." Check. Then it leverages seated market partners to make sure it's in everyone's face as soon as a piece of equipment is powered on. OK, so no failure here. These things Microsoft has done with Hyper-V. It's a robust clone of ESX server, it's aggressively underpriced, it's a part of server operating systems from the word go, and all the major vendors are offering licensing deals on it.

But the coup de grace elements of Microsoft's strategy are strangely missing. Where is the slur marketeering and propaganda campaign? The dirty licensing tactics? The aggressive litigation?

In point of fact, Microsoft is suing all sorts of people in a flurry of new cases centered on the mobile device market, patent infringement in the public cloud, and the Xbox gaming platform. Yet I don't see a single active lawsuit against EMC designed to undermine VMware's market dominance. And while Microsoft has been advertising Hyper-V and the latest iteration of Windows Server aggressively, I am not seeing the mudslinging that I've come to know and love from Redmond.

Finally, while Hyper-V is less expensive than the alternatives, Microsoft is hardly giving it away, as it's done in intense battles of the past. Come on, Microsoft! Without an effective anti-VMware propaganda campaign, how can you expect to continue to gain market share in the face of a product that still has an edge in both innovation and functionality? EMC is certainly not sitting still and waiting for your strategy to overwhelm it, so how can you expect to crush the opposition when you're not even applying all the gizmos in your tool chest to the problem?

Can someone tell me where Gates is? I think we need him back.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Jake McTigue
50%
50%
Jake McTigue,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/1/2012 | 8:13:54 PM
re: Why Hasn't Hyper-V Achieved World Domination Yet?
The article was indeed meant to be humorous, though it has some factual elements in terms of pegging Microsoft's typical business model in emergent markets. But the fact that the Microsoft product is patently inferior has never stopped them from owning competitive markets in the past.

I'm glad the article provoked a strong response from you, such was my intention.

Thanks for stopping in!
Ken Steeves
50%
50%
Ken Steeves,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/1/2012 | 4:50:28 PM
re: Why Hasn't Hyper-V Achieved World Domination Yet?
Very Humorous article! I certainly hope that was your intent!

You say," because the lack of a single industry-standard hypervisor platform is hurting the market from a standards and interoperability perspective."

That's what VMware is! Why are you complaining about/for something that already exists!

Microsoft gains market-share with individuals who don't understand how powerful a hyper-visor below (and independent from) the OS can be. If you just think it's a piece of software that sits on a server that maintains uptime and avoids Windows taking down your whole DC, yes that is a commodity.

Please take a course or do some reading on what is possible through a hyper-visor around security, BCDR, stretch metro clusters, automation, financial management, etc.

That will answer your question as to "Why Microsoft just can't steal this idea and give it away and win?"
Jake McTigue
50%
50%
Jake McTigue,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/1/2012 | 4:31:18 PM
re: Why Hasn't Hyper-V Achieved World Domination Yet?
Thank you for linking the response!
KDrucker
50%
50%
KDrucker,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/31/2012 | 8:20:07 PM
re: Why Hasn't Hyper-V Achieved World Domination Yet?
Interesting perspective on the VMWare/HyperV relationship. The folks over at Unitrends had an equally as interesting response to your article. Here's a link to it, if you're interested. http://www.unitrends.com/blog/...
Google in the Enterprise Survey
Google in the Enterprise Survey
There's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity ­products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent ­mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers ­distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 14, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.