Software // Operating Systems
News
5/18/2013
07:25 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs

Thanks to new apps and smaller, cheap devices, Windows 8 is primed for a rebound -- if Windows 8.1 delivers.

8 Free, Must-Have Windows 8 Apps
8 Free, Must-Have Windows 8 Apps
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Research firm Forrester says IT isn't interested in Windows 8, and that the platform's success relies on consumers and BYOD. Given that consumers aren't exactly embracing the new OS, Win8's prospects are easy to dismiss -- so much so that Frank X. Shaw, Redmond's VP of corporate communications, recently felt compelled to reprimand the media for its emphatically bleak appraisal of his company's plight.

But here's the thing: Shaw could be right. Windows 8's consumer appeal is about to get a major upgrade.

An important note: this prediction presupposes that the OS's usability issues are addressed in Windows 8.1, a free update, formerly known as Windows Blue, expected to be revealed in June.

There's been some doublespeak from Microsoft on the usability point. Redmond executives have claimed that customer feedback informed Blue's development -- but they've also defended Win8's Live Tile start screen, which has been a significant driver of user criticism. There's a fine line between upholding one's convictions and alienating one's fans. Win 8.1 looks like it will land on the right side of that line -- but I'll come back to that later.

First, here are five reasons things are looking up for Windows 8.

1. New Intel Chips, Better Battery Life

Intel's Haswell core chips should be shipping inside Windows 8.1 devices by this fall. If you found the Surface Pro somewhat attractive but were deterred by its poor battery life and modest i5 processor -- your time is coming. Haswell is expected to deliver major improvements in power management, which means designers have more flexibility to balance CPU power and battery life. The result should be Win8 tablets and Ultrabooks that function like high-end laptops but can run all day on a single battery charge. Intel's chips are also expected to facilitate thinner, lighter form factors, and to deliver improved graphics performance -- perfect for the high-density screens that will be common on the next round of high-end, Surface Pro-like machines.

Intel's Bay Trail Atom processors, meanwhile, won't be on the market until later this year. But the new mobile-oriented chips are expected to substantially improve the graphics performance and central processing muscle of Atom-based Windows 8 tablets. Intel says the new processors are twice as powerful as the current ones, and Intel is clearly looking to challenge ARM, the chip of choice for smartphones and tablets. If Bay Trail lives up to its promise, it will enable the lightest and most portable of tablets to not only run the full version of Windows 8, but also, and more importantly, do so without a hitch. In a space dominated by cheap Android tablets and the iPad Mini, the ability to run Microsoft Office and legacy x86 apps could be a major differentiator.

2. Lower Prices

For many users, the first wave of Windows 8 devices was prohibitively expensive. The next wave, however, should offer options to fit all budgets. Intel has stated that Haswell-based Ultrabooks should reach the $600 price point. There will be more expensive options too. But given the improvements the new chips should facilitate, Intel's promise means that devices with more raw processing power and better battery life than the Surface Pro will soon cost only a little more than much-ignored, and x86-incompatible, Surface RT.

Atom-based Windows 8 tablets, meanwhile, could be much cheaper. The prospect of $1,000 Win8 Ultrabooks didn't entice many people -- but $300 for an extremely thin tablet that can capably run Microsoft Office, Photoshop, Angry Birds and most anything else? That could take a bite out of the iPad Mini's sales.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
NPCO
50%
50%
NPCO,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/18/2013 | 2:27:47 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
Unless there's a reasonably efficient (both in practice and in resources usage) start menu or application launcher, 8.1 is of no interest to me. A simply button to launch the start screen is pointless - the start screen itself is a horrible way to launch programs on a mouse driven desktop with a monitor in the 20 to 30 inch range. It might very well work great on a touch screen tablet... but my work computers aren't tablets... they're WORKstations. And for those who endorse typing the names of the programs you want to run, I'm sorry, but I stopped using command line OS's more than 20 years ago. I don't even have to launch applications by typing on Linux for Pete sake.
CopyingAppleIsDangerous
50%
50%
CopyingAppleIsDangerous,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/18/2013 | 6:07:18 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
"There's been some doublespeak from Microsoft on the usability point. Redmond executives have claimed that customer feedback informed Blue's development -- but they've also defended Win8's Live Tile start screen, which has been a significant driver of user criticism. There's a fine line between upholding one's convictions and alienating one's fans. Win 8.1 looks like it will land on the right side of that line -- but I'll come back to that later."

Microsoft is trying very, very hard to lie to their sheep (of which I would be considered one) as long as possible, hoping that somehow, momentum will build with Windows 8, and they can ignore our feedback, and finally get on to their objective, which is to "monetize" those friggin' Live Tiles.

News Alert For Microsoft:

Quit stalling. Your stunt FAILED. Don' you get it? Your user-base sees through all that Metro crap and what you are trying to do. This sentence says it all:

"Speaking of those rumors, with Windows Blue, users will likely gain the option to boot directly to the desktop interface, rather than being force-fed the Live Tiles start screen every time they start their machines."

"force-fed"

Get it? Your force-feeding strategy already FAILED. Give it up already. We want a Windows 7-like interface.

If you want to create a separate application that launches Metro, fine. But quit trying to play mind games with us. We're not stupid, and we know what we want.
vdx660
50%
50%
vdx660,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/19/2013 | 6:02:03 AM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
Microsoft should just have designed Windows 8 to take the strengths of both Non-Touch (Start Menu) and Touch (Start Screen) merged them into one screen instead of having two separate ones as shown: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
Packard Leonberger
50%
50%
Packard Leonberger,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/19/2013 | 2:23:02 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
Windows 8 works great for the Junior High crowd, but I live in an adult world and I don't need pictures and cute little tiles to use an OS. Windows 7 was Microsoft's best attempt at a good OS and they dropped it even though. Give me a break Michael, you really think Windows 8 is going to be worth anything? Millennium Edition? Vista?
Wolf45Kc
50%
50%
Wolf45Kc,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/19/2013 | 5:36:20 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
Have 7 on my desktop and 8 on a new LT I purchased for the wife
to be honest the have not had a good OS since XP Pro
JPolk
50%
50%
JPolk,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/19/2013 | 6:58:44 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
NONE of the other factors matter besides the UI. I don't care how many apps you have, how fast the CPU is, and frankly point number 3 is ridiculous. Touch is what killed this OS in the first place. Rather than embrace touch as an extension of the user experience MS decided to bank of dropping the desktop and arrogantly assumed it had the clout to force-feed touch on a public that, as it turns out, can't actually work in this environment and doesn't want to sit and "figure out" the OS. Without reverting back to a desktop-centric OS, Windows is dead. Period. No one wants to touch their way through the work day. Make the touch interface an extension of the OS that only presents when touch makes sense and keep the overwhelming majority of people in the desktop where thousands of apps, particularly WORK apps, live and thrive.
I'm very much aware people "can" learn the environment but why should they? With alternatives MS is just chasing people away. If they don't bring the desktop back, people will start looking to alternatives and somewhere, someone will fill that niche and the EOL of Windows 7 will see a migration away from Windows 8. MS had better learn a lesson here. Until the entire industry moves to touch (and other innovations come to make the migration intuitive and "workable"), Windows makes no sense as a touch-only or predominantly touch environment.
JPolk
50%
50%
JPolk,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/19/2013 | 7:04:48 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
"By the time this year's back-to-school and holiday seasons roll around, store shelves should not only feature a great abundance of touch-oriented Windows 8 devices but also a greater diversity of form factors."

So OEM's are chomping at the bit to send products to market that few people are buying now because Santa Clause is bringing them? Really!? "I wanted a real Windows laptop, Mommy!" "Well, Honey, Mommy asked Santa and he said Microsoft told him to tell us to shut up and learn the new OS!" This Christmas should be great! No one will get what they want...not even the PC makers are just want a decent profit!
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
5/19/2013 | 7:50:07 PM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
No question, the UI is THE major issue-- and the article uses this precise point as its bookends. That said, I don't think Point 3 is ridiculous. There's evidence that Windows 8 has a better adoption rate on tablets than it does on more traditional computers, and the holiday sales were hampered not only by complaints about the UI but also the fact that the few touch-enabled Win8 devices on the market were not only compromised (e.g. battery life) but also expensive. If Win 8.1 accompanies a great diversity of device types, a greater diversity of price points, and fewer compromises, then Microsoft will have removed several of the barriers that blocked adoption. The UI issue remains, so price, battery life and all the rest doesn't constitute some sort of panacea. But a panacea should deliver HUGE gains, not the sort of organic progress I'm talking about.

To be clear, this isn't to say that these barriers are as important as the UI. As I wrote in the article, if Win 8 can't immediately engage the user, a lot of people simply won't bother with it. But will more options and more price points encourage some fence-sitting would-be consumers to buy? Of course it will. It's useful to have x86 in a highly portable package with great battery life. If Microsoft can hitch that capability to an improved tablet interface, that appeal will only grow. Do tens of millions of people value this utility? Maybe not. But it's pretty tough to say that it doesn't matter to anyone, and that it won't have a positive impact on Win 8 adoption. As the article said, we're not talking the kind of growth that Android had over the last year. We're talking about Windows 8 becoming a legitimate third option on tablets. The reasons I cited might not be colossal game-changers individually, but the aggregate effect of a series of small enhancements can still be pretty big-- especially if the UI is good enough to avoid distracting users from the other benefits.

And about that "good enough" argument. One of the ideas implicit in that argument is that I'm NOT defending Windows 8 as a triumph of user design. I'm saying that Microsoft has some built-in advantages that it can leverage-- like access to x86 apps. To an extent, Windows 8's tepid sales suggest that Redmond assumed these advantages were more powerful than they actually are. But even if Windows 8 doesn't delight users like iOS and Android do, it also offers use cases that neither iOS nor Android can support. That makes the OS useful and provides a case for buying a Win8 device-- especially now that they're cheaper, faster and more power-efficient.

As for 'touching" one's way through the work day-- you have a point, but only for certain kinds of users. For someone like me, who spends most of the day pounding on a keyboard, the idea of relying on a touch UI is terrifying. And though I value tablets with attachable keyboards when I have to do reporting at a conference or something, I still want a real monitor and real keyboard whenever I can get one. For lots of tasks, traditional computers are still more preferable than any of the touch-oriented options.

But a lot of business tasks aren't above heavy content creation. They're about having the right information at the right moment-- about optimized content sharing and consumption, in other words. For those users, touch-oriented devices make the workday better, not worse. PCs aren't going away, but the workplace won't be dominated by a single device type either. Work will flow around a variety of endpoints, with touch a bigger deal for some people than for others.

I don't think Microsoft needs to make a version of Windows without touch. Instead, I think Microsoft needs to make sure that all the touch-oriented stuff doesn't get in the way of the desktop experience. It was a poor decision, for example, to force users - even those on traditional PCs - to boot to the Live Tile start screen. But Windows 8.1 is most likely fixing that problem, and as long as it fixes a few others, the reasons to buy won't be as outnumbered by the reasons not to buy.

That's not to say Windows 8 will suddenly be a huge success. I don't think it will EVER achieve the market penetration that Windows 7 has, for example. But do I believe there's a market that would value cheap tablets that also handle work-related tasks? Not when most models are deeply compromised and/or expensive, no. But when some of the compromises go away and prices drop, yes, I think that market will be there.

To be clear, Windows 8 will still be a sort of "jack of all trades, master of none" in many respects-- but unless the user has specific needs (i.e. "master" needs), new Win8 tablets will offer undeniable value propositions. Will that be good enough to stimulate meaningful Windows 8 adoption? It depends on how you define "meaningful" -- does Redmond need a 10% market share by 2014? 20%? 30%? As long as "meaningful" isn't defined in particularly lofty terms, and as long as Win8.1 isn't a complete flop, I think the setting is right for Windows 8 to make gains.

Michael Endler, IW Associate Editor
Andrew Hornback
50%
50%
Andrew Hornback,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/20/2013 | 3:16:52 AM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
Not that I'm rushing to defend Microsoft here, but I've come to realize something lately - Windows is an OS that has to be all things to all people. It's everywhere and does everything. Therein lies the problem - nearly everything is a compromise.

Now, how should Microsoft fix that? I think that's the question that they need to find an answer to. Here's how I'd do it, and not simply DX the Metro interface and get a Start Menu button back - Microsoft needs to find a way to make Windows more easily customizable so that everyone can either use what comes straight out of the box or dive deeper into it (easily) and build out the UI that they want and create the user experience that they want with ease.

If I want to strip down the Windows UI to the point that it makes Win3.1 look modern in order to improve my system performance, I should be able to do that via the Control Panel, a widget somewhere or something else that comes with the OS. Additionally, if I want to add all of the doo-dads and build a cluttered machine, I should be able to do that too. If you want a machine with touch enabled, go for it. If you don't need touch enablement, turn it off and optimize your system - that sort of thing.

Sure, there are ways of doing both of those things - shell replacements and the like - but that's beyond the scope and grasp of the average user. If Microsoft could put that kind of power in the hands of the average user, I think the complaints about the UI would be over.

Andrew Hornback
InformationWeek Contributor
Zod
50%
50%
Zod,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/20/2013 | 4:10:34 AM
re: Windows 8: 5 Hopeful Signs
Here is what I want to know. Has Microsoft done anything about the inability to run native 8 apps in multiple windows? I use my computer for work. As such, it is normal for me to have 20-40 separate, individual windows open at any given time. This includes about a dozen Office app windows, two dozen RDP sessions to manage servers, about a dozen browser windows, (IE, Firefox and Chrome) and a dozen or two notepad windows. *ALL* of these windows exist autonomously on my screen. I need to see two or three office documents and an RDP session at the same time. I need to see 3 RDP sessions and 5 notepad windows at the same time. I need to see 3 browser windows and several office windows at the same time! Currently, with windows 8, this is impossible. Is Microsoft going to do something about this?
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest - July 22, 2014
Sophisticated attacks demand real-time risk management and continuous monitoring. Here's how federal agencies are meeting that challenge.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.