Google's 'Screw Up' Looks Expensive - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Healthcare // Analytics
Commentary
5/27/2010
07:16 PM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google's 'Screw Up' Looks Expensive

Google's Street View snafu may end up being one of the more costly copy-and-paste mistakes in recent memory. In the past ten days, there have been six lawsuits filed against Google in the U.S. for alleged illegal data interception.

Google's Street View snafu may end up being one of the more costly copy-and-paste mistakes in recent memory. In the past ten days, there have been six lawsuits filed against Google in the U.S. for alleged illegal data interception.All because of a mistake, as Google SVP of engineering Alan Eustace recently explained:

In 2006 an engineer working on an experimental WiFi project wrote a piece of code that sampled all categories of publicly broadcast WiFi data. A year later, when our mobile team started a project to collect basic WiFi network data like SSID information and MAC addresses using Google's Street View cars, they included that code in their software-although the project leaders did not want, and had no intention of using, payload data.

Mind you, this is publicly broadcast data. Anyone with the technical know-how can write software that will grab unprotected data traveling over WiFi networks. Even if the data is protected, there's plenty of free packet sniffing and encryption-cracking software to enable snooping.

Those suing Google are alleging privacy and wiretap law violations despite Google's claim that it didn't even know it had the data. You too could be guilty of this sort of wiretapping, if you've ever made a mobile call that was recorded on an answering machine and happened to capture the conversation of someone talking nearby.

Was any harm done? I doubt it. Even so, the legal fees and inevitable settlement will probably be disproportionate to any real damage. This is not like the company's Buzz launch fiasco, which arguably put some users at real risk from stalking ex-spouses and may have exposed confidential relationships.

The inadvertently gathered WiFi data apparently remained in Google's data centers, unused and inaccessible to the outside world.

Certainly Google should revise its policies so that it knows what its code does. But beyond that, this strikes me as a case of regulators and attorneys gone wild.

The Enterprise 2.0 Conference is the largest gathering for people ready to connect teams, and harness collective intelligence with social tools and 2.0 technologies. It happens in Boston, June 14-17. Find out more here.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
Reflections on Tech in 2019
James M. Connolly, Editorial Director, InformationWeek and Network Computing,  12/9/2019
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll