Blogging Code Of Conduct Proposed To Tame The Net - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
News
News
4/9/2007
02:42 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Blogging Code Of Conduct Proposed To Tame The Net

O'Reilly's recommendation to ban abusive or false online posts draws support, as well as criticism.

In the wake of threats directed at a now-prominent blogger and subsequent soul-searching among the Internet cognoscenti, Tim O'Reilly, founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media, has proposed a Blogging Code of Conduct as a means to rescue online civility.

The code calls for a commitment to reject or delete online posts that "abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others," or anything that "is libelous, knowingly false, ad-hominem, or misrepresents another person," "infringes upon a copyright or trademark," "violates an obligation of confidentiality," and "violates the privacy of others."

It calls for responsible speech, taking action against unfair attacks, and a refusal to accept anonymous posting.

Among those commenting on the draft rules on O'Reilly's Radar blog and elsewhere, reactions range from enthusiastic and supportive to, unsurprisingly, dismissive and abusive.

Acknowledging the limits of his draft rules, O'Reilly points to these ad hominem attacks in a follow-up comment and says that rather than deleting them, he "will probably allow [them] here because this post is trying to suss out sentiment on what is a controversial issue."

Most of the comments seem to fall in the nice-try-but-it-will-never-work category. "A blogger code of conduct would be like herding hornets -- nice idea but painful to all in execution," said a person posting under the name Steven Hodson.

In support of that thesis, there's an instructive parallel: spam. Spamming, like posting abusive comments on blogs, is all but free. There is a potential cost -- litigation -- but it's rarely imposed.

Thus, despite the fact that the American Marketing Association in 2004 issued a Statement of Ethics, calling for marketers to "do no harm," "to foster trust in the marketing system," and to "practice the fundamental ethical values that will improve consumer confidence in the integrity of the marketing exchange system," some marketers remain spammers and everyone online continues to suffer from abusive Internet marketing.

Curbing abusive speech online through a voluntary code of conduct appears likely to prove equally ineffective.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
Slideshows
11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
News
Time to Shift Your Job Search Out of Neutral
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/31/2021
Commentary
Does Identity Hinder Hybrid-Cloud and Multi-Cloud Adoption?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  4/1/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll