Chicago Cloud Computing Tax Is Not Amusing - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Cloud
Commentary
7/3/2015
09:05 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Commentary
100%
0%

Chicago Cloud Computing Tax Is Not Amusing

In a new ruling, Chicago is planning to tax cloud-computing services such as Netflix and Apple's new music service. CIOs should pay attention.

10 Online Cloud Computing Courses To Get Ahead
10 Online Cloud Computing Courses To Get Ahead
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

The Windy City is looking to fill its tax coffers with cloud computing.

Chicago has ruled that its local amusement tax will be extended to cloud-based delivered content effective as of the first of this month. This means that entertainment services like Netflix or the new Apple Music Service can be taxed when delivered to Chicago residents.

The Chicago Tribune reported that the tax will bring in $12 million in its first year.

CIOs will want to watch this development since the new rules were broad enough so that they apply to the general delivery of cloud services.

The ruling invokes the broader nonpossessory computer lease tax which covers the use of leased computer services.

In the new ruling, city officials specifically identify taxable leases of personal property to include "functions such as word processing, calculations, data processing, tax preparation, spreadsheet preparation, presentations and other applications available to a customer through access to a provider's computer and its software. These last examples are sometimes referred to as cloud computing, cloud services, hosted environment, software as a service, platform as a service, or infrastructure as a service."

Well, wow. This is more than amusement. It's a land grab on the electronic frontier.

(Image: PaulMoody123/iStockphoto)

(Image: PaulMoody123/iStockphoto)

I spoke to Michael Wynne, a partner in the ReedSmith law firm in Chicago, who has already written about this ruling in his blog. He has extensive tax litigation experience in the state and city arenas.

Wynne noted there has only been one case tried on the lease tax, and that was in 1989, before the rise of the Web.

"I don't think that anyone entering into agreements for infrastructure services [is] contracting for personal property," Wynne said. "Just because you get a bill from Company A doesn't mean you are using Company A's servers."

Indeed, Wynne finds fault in how the tax bill that was revised by Chicago was formulated in the first place.

"The meaning of the original bill is that the person that has the property is basically lending it to you," he said, adding, "There's a lot of assumptions in the bill that do not translate well to how services are actually being delivered today. Things are being extended in areas for which they were not envisioned."

There is already talk of an appeal.

"There are no direct parties named as participants here. I think if it's appealed it will come because someone got surprised by this tax," Wynne noted.

The ruling does allow some mitigation strategies.

[Is technology out to get us? Read 9 Ways Technology Is Slowly Killing Us All.]

For instance, only the users of a service who are located in Chicago should be charged this tax, not the total users of a service. Since vendors are responsible for collecting the tax, ascertaining whether or not they are doing it in a proper manner on the proper services becomes important for them. Storage services or accessing read-only data are not taxable, for example.

Other governmental bodies will be watching how this ruling is accepted. While it is easy for a company to move across a city line if it is onerous, it may be far harder to do that if the state imposes such a tax.

Wynne said, "I think taxation of these services is on everybody's radar screen. I have no doubt it is being looked at."

Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek. He has written a book on the Secure Electronic Transaction Internet ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Gary_EL
50%
50%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
7/4/2015 | 1:43:01 PM
Level Playing Field
If something is taxed when it is provided "Brick and Mortar" businesses, it should also be taxed if it is provided via the Cloud. Bravo Chicago!
Blog Voyage
50%
50%
Blog Voyage,
User Rank: Strategist
7/4/2015 | 6:20:08 AM
Re: Internally inconsistent
Just asking the same question
larryloeb
50%
50%
larryloeb,
User Rank: Author
7/3/2015 | 10:40:37 PM
Re: Everything is taxed
They also broradened the lease tax.

That is where they are sneaking in taxing the cloud services.
larryloeb
50%
50%
larryloeb,
User Rank: Author
7/3/2015 | 10:38:42 PM
Re: Internally inconsistent
Netflix is not something like a stock market ticker.

You interact with it, and choose what you want to be displayed.
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
7/3/2015 | 9:08:57 PM
Re: Everything is taxed
This certainly is a windfall for the city of Chicago. I wouldn't be surprised if other municipalities or even states work towards this as a way to generate revenue.

Is if fair? Maybe. If this does affect cloud computing services, there could be real concern. Because I don't see how it should be interpreted in that way if it is an amusement tax. 
OneTimePoster
50%
50%
OneTimePoster,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/3/2015 | 12:01:04 PM
Internally inconsistent
"Storage services or accessing read-only data are not taxable, for example"

 

Could someone help me better understand how Netflix is NOT providing read-only data? 

 

 
larryloeb
50%
50%
larryloeb,
User Rank: Author
7/3/2015 | 11:04:20 AM
Re: Everything is taxed
The money that is actually billed. They get a 9% surcharge,
Li Tan
50%
50%
Li Tan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/3/2015 | 10:48:13 AM
Everything is taxed
It's of no surprise that cloud computing will be taxed. But how the taxation will be calculated? Based on subscription or the actual time of usage?
Commentary
Learning: It's a Give and Take Thing
James M. Connolly, Editorial Director, InformationWeek and Network Computing,  1/24/2020
Slideshows
IT Careers: Top 10 US Cities for Tech Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  1/14/2020
Commentary
Predictions for Cloud Computing in 2020
James Kobielus, Research Director, Futurum,  1/9/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
State of the Cloud
State of the Cloud
Cloud has drastically changed how IT organizations consume and deploy services in the digital age. This research report will delve into public, private and hybrid cloud adoption trends, with a special focus on infrastructure as a service and its role in the enterprise. Find out the challenges organizations are experiencing, and the technologies and strategies they are using to manage and mitigate those challenges today.
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll