The Open Cloud Manifesto, not surprisingly, has leaked out. Though its formal publication isn't due until March 30, the document seems to be one of the tech industry's worst kept secrets.
The Open Cloud Manifesto, not surprisingly, has leaked out. Though its formal publication isn't due until March 30, the document seems to be one of the tech industry's worst kept secrets.I got the manifesto from Geva Perry's Thinking Out Cloud blog. Geva says he got the document, which is supposedly under embargo, from four different sources with no strings attached. You can view it (draft 1.0.9) here.
So, what is the Open Cloud Manifesto? The six-page document defines cloud computing, lays out the challenges and barriers to adoption (security, interoperability, app portability, etc.), and outlines the goals of an open cloud. Not much to argue about there.
The manifesto concludes with six "principles of an open cloud," and it's this part of the document, I assume, that got Microsoft's dander up. It's here that the manifesto authors present their demands of cloud vendors. A sampling: "Cloud providers must work together to ensure the challenges to cloud adoption are addressed through open collaboration and the appropriate use of standards. Cloud providers must not use their market position to lock customers into their particular platforms. Cloud providers must use and adopt existing standard where appropriate." And so on.
You have to admire the spirit of the Open Cloud Manifesto; its intentions are good. The risks of cloud vendor lock-in are real, and industry commitment to an "open cloud" is a worthy goal.
But the manifesto is getting off to a rocky start for several reasons, and Microsoft's rejection of it is just one of them. Over on a Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum discussion thread, some observers feel left out of the process of drafting it. "There is nothing open about the Open Cloud Manifesto," writes one person. "It's an industry alliance or an attempt at it."
Other problems, as I pointed out in a post yesterday, include potential conflicts of interest and a cart-before-the-horse situation where standards compliance is being mandated even though cloud technology is in the early stages of development. What's more, telling cloud vendors--Amazon, Google, Microsoft--that they "must work together" or "must use and adopt existing standards" is a non-starter. Good luck with that.
To be fair, we don't yet have the full story on the Open Cloud Manifesto. We need to see it in its final form and hear from its authors and supporters. The biggest question in my mind is the degree to which IT pros and other users are involved. The questions will soon be answered. The manifesto will be formally presented on Monday.
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security EnterpriseTo learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
2017 State of IT ReportIn today's technology-driven world, "innovation" has become a basic expectation. IT leaders are tasked with making technical magic, improving customer experience, and boosting the bottom line -- yet often without any increase to the IT budget. How are organizations striking the balance between new initiatives and cost control? Download our report to learn about the biggest challenges and how savvy IT executives are overcoming them.