Continuity's RecoveryGuard Reveals DR Flaws - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
News
Commentary
1/30/2008
10:20 PM
Howard Marks
Howard Marks
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Continuity's RecoveryGuard Reveals DR Flaws

Today's large IT environments are dynamic places; applications, volumes, and file systems are added, deleted, and reallocated on SANs on a daily basis. The disaster recovery plan, on the other hand, is updated and tested on an annual basis. As a result, most organizations think their data is better protected than it really is.

Today's large IT environments are dynamic places; applications, volumes, and file systems are added, deleted, and reallocated on SANs on a daily basis. The disaster recovery plan, on the other hand, is updated and tested on an annual basis. As a result, most organizations think their data is better protected than it really is.If the Oracle DBAs say they need another 1TB LUN (logical disk), a storage administrator may skip step 19 in the official provisioning process that says to add the new LUN, and it's doppelganger at the DR site to the replication regime. When each management group looks in their management consoles, everything looks hunky dory.

Continuity Software's RecoveryGuard discovers the Oracle database, which LUNs it's using, and how they're replicating, and raises the red flag that the Oracle database isn't as protected as we thought it was. RecoveryGuard can investigate Oracle, Sybase, and MS SQL Server databases, and EMC's SRDF and Network Appliance SNAPmirror replication.

Continuity Software offers a free 48-hour evaluation and a spokesman told me that they have found at least one gap in the data protection at every company that's taken advantage of the offer. Since in our recent survey almost 60% the respondents indicated that they failed to recover at least one of their important applications in their last DR test, I can believe it.

Right now, RecoveryGuard is for the big boys with EMC and NetApp infrastructures that don't mind paying $2,000/protected server/a year to avoid multimillion dollar data losses. For them, it could be a bargain.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Commentary
New Storage Trends Promise to Help Enterprises Handle a Data Avalanche
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  4/1/2021
Slideshows
11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
Commentary
How to Submit a Column to InformationWeek
InformationWeek Staff 4/9/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll