DefCon: The Few, The Weird, The Hackers - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


DefCon: The Few, The Weird, The Hackers

Thousands of federal agents, security professionals, and hackers--some wearing black T-shirts and leather boots despite the 100-plus-degree desert heat, converged on Las Vegas during the weekend to attend the annual DefCon security conference. There, they shared secrets of protecting--and breaking into--computers.

In a gathering of flamboyant computer experts that sometimes color their hair green or pink and revel in challenging authority, perhaps the most flamboyant is a group of hackers called the Cult of the Dead Cow.

The Cult of the Dead Cow has gained notoriety in the past two years for creating and making freely available remote administration tools for Microsoft Windows machines called Back Orifice and Back Orifice 2000. Using the tool, an administrator could remotely operate a Windows machine across the Internet, but so could malicious hackers if they could install the tool on a victim's machine.

The Cult of the Dead Cow is not a software company, and the group emphasized that fact by not releasing a new version of its Back Orifice remote administration tool at DefCon. "People seem to be expecting us to release more, but that's really your problem," says a CDC spokesman. This year, the independent group of hackers promoted a tool called NDNames. The new tool takes advantage of a flaw in the Microsoft Windows NetBIOs name service over TCP connections, which makes it possible to block network devices' ability to communicate with other machines.

The group told Microsoft about the flaw in June, and Microsoft issued a patch for the bug on Thursday. However, the patch was for Windows 2000 systems only--not for Windows NT, 95, or 98 machines.

When NDNames is installed on a network, the tool will intercept a server's request for an identifying name and deny its use or give it a conflicting name with another machine, thereby removing its ability to communicate with other machines. In that way, says CDC member "Sir Dystic," machines that routinely update their identification to a network would be disabled one by one.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll