AMD Says Intel Paid PC Makers To Boycott Rival - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Infrastructure // PC & Servers

AMD Says Intel Paid PC Makers To Boycott Rival

The add-on to the 2005 antitrust suit claims Intel paid off Acer, Dell, Gateway, major Japanese manufacturers, and system builders to block out AMD.

Advanced Micro Devices has expanded the allegations in its antitrust suit against Intel, saying its larger rival paid computer makers not to do business with AMD.

In court papers filed May 1 in U.S. District Court in Delaware, AMD said Intel paid off Acer, Dell, Gateway, major Japanese manufacturers, and system builders and distributors "to close their doors to AMD." Where it couldn't buy exclusivity from computer makers, Intel focused its payments on keeping computers based on AMD microprocessors away from large business customers, AMD said.

Most of the details in the 108-page document, unsealed Monday, have been blacked out, due to a protective order restricting the disclosure of trade secrets and other confidential dealings involving the parties in the suit. AMD sued Intel in June 2005, accusing the chipmaker of illegally using its monopoly to shut AMD out of the market.

The latest filing said Intel paid customers to abandon development of computer models that were essential to the success of a new line of AMD processors. The tactic also was used "to nip in the bud AMD inroads into sectors Intel viewed as critical."

In addition, Intel used discount schemes that made it uneconomical for AMD to compete for a customer's business, and deployed various strong-arm tactics against partners that refused to go along. Those retaliatory tactics included withdrawing marketing funds, withholding critical technical and road map information, allocating scarce products away from disloyal companies, and generally scaling back the level of customer support, the filing said.

In its own brief, Intel denied any anticompetitive practices. The company said that AMD was seeking court protection from discounting and other legal practices within a competitive environment.

"AMD's complaint about Intel's discounting boils down to a complaint that Intel is a more efficient competitor," Intel said.

For a few years before 2006, AMD managed to take market share from Intel, particularly in the market for processors powering server computers. About two years ago, Intel embarked on a reorganization that saw the chipmaker get several important products out before its smaller rival, including a quad-core processor and next-generation 45-nanometer chips that deliver higher power-to-performance ratios.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

11 Things IT Professionals Wish They Knew Earlier in Their Careers
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/6/2021
Time to Shift Your Job Search Out of Neutral
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  3/31/2021
Does Identity Hinder Hybrid-Cloud and Multi-Cloud Adoption?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  4/1/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Successful Strategies for Digital Transformation
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Flash Poll