Social Faux Pas
So why does social networking still give me pause? First, the abuse factor, something that all the vendors in this space claim can be protected against via privacy and "opt-in/opt-out" functionalities. Suppose a condition of employment with your new company was that you had to open up your social network to the rest of the workforce and you couldn't refuse a fellow employee's request for a connection. It would be pretty silly to run a business in which coercive sales tactics were practiced on the unwilling, except that everyone reading this column probably knows a vendor (or two or three) that will stop at nothing to get a deal. Imagine if the next step in a "stop at nothing" sales pitch involved bringing to bear your social network on the deal. It would kill your relationships, but if it helped the company make its numbers that quarter, so what? Death by a thousand spams would look infinitely preferable to being part of a coercive social network.
The second reason is that there are a lot of examples of social network economies that don't function particularly well. When I worked in France in the 1990s, I was amazed at how many executives and other movers and shakers all hailed from the same graduate school, l'Ecole Polytechnique. For many of these "polytechniciens," entrepreneurship consisted of calling on one's fellow graduates and securing a deal. Merit, quality, and even price seemed to matter little in this closed-off social network. And I would venture that one of the big problems with French high tech at the time was that social networking was the only real goal. Competing on value just didn't make the cut among French businesses, which put them at a distinct disadvantage when other companies, American and German, dared to place value above connections.
Finally, there's what I call the friendship quality problem. Just because someone thinks you're a friend doesn't mean you feel the same way. And just because you've worked or broken bread with everyone in your social network doesn't mean you'd go to bat for them and broker that connection they so desperately need. I meet a lot of people in this world and try to maintain cordial relations with most of them. But just because I know and even like you doesn't mean I'm going to go risk my valuable relationship capital on your problem. What if I don't think it's a good idea or that the person you want to meet wouldn't care to take the meeting? How do I say no without damaging a relationship? The protagonist in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House brings down the ire of feminists in every generation when he says, "No man would sacrifice his honor for love." But in the world of business connections, sacrificing honor for the social network would be foolish indeed.
Having said all that, I have to confess that I think social networking can work. It builds off a new business object, the relationships inherent in our business connections, that makes it a great platform for enterprise software success. (See "Predicting Software Success," Nov. 18, 2003.) It leverages existing technology in the form of the information already available in your contact database. And it has immediate applicability assuming you have a decent social network to tap into, you can get started leveraging those connections quite quickly.
Whether all this connectivity will pay off is another question. Once you've made the connection, you're still stuck with proving the merits of the pitch to someone you don't necessarily know. Which means you're still dependent on having something worthwhile to sell and someone interested in buying. But all other things being equal, social network software could be a big help.
Unless you're trying to reach the 35 people who work in Silicon Valley. In which case, just drop me a line.
Joshua Greenbaum [[email protected]] is a principal at Enterprise Applications Consulting. He researches enterprise apps and e-business.
Spoke Software: www.spoke.com
"Predicting Software Success," Nov. 18, 2003