Does Microsoft's TomTom Beating Bode Ill For Open Source? - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Government // Enterprise Architecture
01:01 PM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Connect Directly

Does Microsoft's TomTom Beating Bode Ill For Open Source?

Open source folks are nervous about a Microsoft lawsuit against in-car GPS maker TomTom, allegedly because of possible implications for Linux.

Open source folks are nervous about a Microsoft lawsuit against in-car GPS maker TomTom, allegedly because of possible implications for Linux.

Most of the issues seem to revolve around several patents that Microsoft filed regarding file systems. Two patents cover the use of the 8.3 file-naming convention, designed for backward compatibility between file systems that support both long and short file names. Another handles a file system for flash memory, so that a block-programmable flash device can be handled as if it were a byte- or bit-addressable file system.

So are these lawsuits against Linux or some GPL software per se? It's not clear, partly because the suit is directed at TomTom's implementations of Linux and other GPL technologies, and not at any other agency. Much of the speculation revolves around this being the tip of the sword about to run through the FOSS community, etc., but I seriously doubt Microsoft would attempt to do something that stupid and self-destructive this late in the game.

A few things are worth noting. One is that Microsoft claims it's been trying to reach an agreement with TomTom for more than a year regarding these patent claims and that it's falling back on a lawsuit as a last resort. The other is that back in 2004, TomTom ran into trouble with the gpl-violations project, apparently for modifying the Linux kernel in its TomTom GO product and not publishing the changes back to the community. Based on that, it sounds like TomTom has a generally bad history of dealing with intellectual property, period.

If this is more TomTom's fault than Microsoft's, fine. The problem, again, is that with Microsoft, people don't think that there's a clear line as to what's safe to do and what's not -- whether or not doing something wholly innocuous could get you sued. It's made all the more complicated by Microsoft's recent strides toward the open source community, where it's putting on a more conciliatory face and trying to attract many of the very people it was scaring off.

It'd be in Microsoft's best interest to come out and say, definitively, what this means vis-à-vis Linux and FOSS generally. Of course, there's always the chance that even it doesn't know -- which is in itself scary.

InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on overhauling Microsoft. Download the report here (registration required).

Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Flash Poll