Fixing The E-Voting Mess - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Feature
News
1/12/2007
03:05 PM
50%
50%

Fixing The E-Voting Mess

Advocacy groups push for electronic voting reform.

Where there's controversy, there's opportunity for advocacy groups like the Electronic Privacy Information Center. On that score, the elections of 2000 sprung open a huge new market.

Since then, EPIC and other advocacy groups have done a lot of work related to improving voting machines and computerized alternatives. The Help America Vote Act of 2002 required federal officials to improve elections but didn't say how. "You have vendors telling the Election Assistance Commission and the National Institute of Standards and Technology what they need to do with the voting solution," says Marc Rotenberg, EPIC's executive director. "That's a problem."

One battleground is Florida's Sarasota County, where watchdog groups allege that voting machines supplied by Election Systems & Software failed to record up to 18,000 votes in last November's U.S. House race between Democrat Christine Jennings and Republican Vern Buchanan, who won by fewer than 400 votes. Jennings sued for a new election, with support from the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Buchanan has taken his seat in the 110th Congress, pending the outcome of the case.

The issue's moving into a new phase on the federal level. In December, the Technical Guidelines Development Committee advised the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission to require paper or other software-independent means of auditing election results. But it's a mistake to push for a paper-trail approach rather than issue guidelines to vendors and have them find the best solution, says Steven Hertzberg, project director of the Election Science Institute, a tech advocacy group created around the e-voting issue. "Political momentum takes over any logical scientific engineering discussion," he says.

This year, NIST will issue recommendations for improving voting systems, both mechanical and electronic. With the presidential election around the corner, count on e-voting to kick up plenty of controversy, with advocacy groups at the forefront.

Illustration by Viktor Koen

Return to the story:
Do The Tech Watchdog Groups Need Watching?

Continue to the sidebar:
How To Get Vendors To Share Their Plans

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
The State of Cloud Computing - Fall 2020
Download this report to compare how cloud usage and spending patterns have changed in 2020, and how respondents think they'll evolve over the next two years.
Commentary
2021 Outlook: Tackling Cloud Transformation Choices
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  1/4/2021
News
Enterprise IT Leaders Face Two Paths to AI
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  12/23/2020
Slideshows
10 IT Trends to Watch for in 2021
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/22/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll