Four Steps To Creating Successful Project Portfolios - InformationWeek
IoT
IoT
Business & Finance
Commentary
3/4/2003
02:07 PM
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
50%
50%
RELATED EVENTS
Building Security for the IoT
Nov 09, 2017
In this webcast, experts discuss the most effective approaches to securing Internet-enabled system ...Read More>>

Four Steps To Creating Successful Project Portfolios

The criterion typically assumed to be most important in assessing projects is financial return. But that approach can overlook some huge opportunities.

A successful company is much like the human body in motion: The movements of individual parts are coordinated in order to move the entity as a whole in a single direction. One of the most important factors in driving a company in a desired direction is coordinating and prioritizing projects, including most IT efforts. The task of assigning value to projects can be a confusing one, and the key to project prioritization is in prioritizing the criteria. For while decisions about projects are indeed based on a composite picture, that picture will be much clearer if the various analyses are assigned their proper places.

The criterion typically assumed to be most important in assessing projects is financial return. Return on investment is certainly an important factor, but a project can hardly be deemed a valuable one--no matter how high the financial return--if it leads a company in the wrong direction. Thus, the first factor that should be considered in determining a project's worth is how well it links to corporate and business-unit strategy (possible exceptions are investments relating to government regulation and IT infrastructure). Investments that move a company in the direction that corporate goals dictate are always going to be more valuable than ones that do not, no matter what the numbers say.

Second in line to strategic considerations is the financial analysis. Before crunching numbers, however, it's important to develop a conceptual understanding of the investment--that is, whether the project is a revenue-enhancer (one that will, for example, enable the company to reach new customers), a cost reducer (a project that will automate manual processes, for instance), or an enabler (such as a technological platform on which other projects will be built). This understanding provides a foundation on which a solid quantitative analysis can be layered. The resulting financial picture will be more complete and will thereby help avoid one-dimensional decisions, such as dismissing an enabler simply because it might have a negative return on investment. Once a positive assessment of the above two factors is achieved, it's important to evaluate risk. Risk should be analyzed from five perspectives:

  • Technology--for example, whether it has been tested
  • Management--whether, for instance, a large number of people is required to oversee the project
  • Implementation--perhaps results will not be seen for several years
  • External factors such as government regulation or concerns about the economy
  • Financial considerations--risk to credit rating, for example

Risk balance is also important in a portfolio of projects. High risk is not necessarily cause for automatic rejection, as leadership in an industry often requires some risk-taking.

The final criterion of project assessment is often overlooked: interproject dependencies. A project cannot be assessed in isolation if there are other projects that depend on it or that it depends on. Along the same lines, project derivatives are an equally important consideration, particularly when a project demands a high up-front investment or a high level of training. If the project is likely to spawn new, related projects, the return on the investment in time, training, and dollars is likely to be that much greater, a likelihood that should be factored into the assessment.

Creating a strong portfolio of projects need not be left to guesswork. Following these four factors in just that order-- linkage to strategy, financial analysis, risk assessment, and interproject dependencies--can put your company on a path that leads to a single destination: success.

Peter High is president of Metis Strategy LLC, a Washington, D.C.-based boutique consulting firm focused on business and IT strategy.

To discuss this column with other readers, please visit the Talk Shop.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2017 State of IT Report
In today's technology-driven world, "innovation" has become a basic expectation. IT leaders are tasked with making technical magic, improving customer experience, and boosting the bottom line -- yet often without any increase to the IT budget. How are organizations striking the balance between new initiatives and cost control? Download our report to learn about the biggest challenges and how savvy IT executives are overcoming them.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll