GM Expects More From Software And Vendors - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

04:15 PM

GM Expects More From Software And Vendors

As software's role in cars grows, quality and licensing practices gain importance

With General Motors Corp. less than two years from the end of its mammoth 10-year outsourcing contract with EDS, chief technology officer Tony Scott told a gathering of software executives last week that the automaker's next-generation outsourcing model will have a more modular contract structure and will be built around fast-evolving IT requirements as more software code is pumped into new GM vehicles.

GM needs software to move data across the globe, CTO Tony Scott said.

GM needs software to move data across the globe, CTO Scott said.
The increasingly software-intensive nature of auto design places a greater emphasis than ever on issues such as software quality, licensing practices, and compliance with the global business-process standards GM has implemented in recent years, Scott said at the SoftSummit conference in Santa Clara, Calif.

At the top of GM's software requirements is the need to support an increasingly global business that's growing more dependent on sharing data during the design process. Examples include an ongoing effort to use more standardized parts across brands and makes throughout the world, and the collection of vehicle-performance information from its OnStar in-car communications system. "What we need is software that's going to move information about product across this whole ecosystem," Scott said.

During GM's current contract with EDS--a company GM owned for 12 years before spinning it off in 1996--the automaker has reduced its IT budget by about $1 billion a year, to $3 billion. EDS captures about three-quarters of that budget, since GM's IT operation is nearly 100% outsourced, with oversight by an internal IT staff of 1,700. The new outsourcing model, Scott said, will break the contract up into numerous contracts--the exact number hasn't been disclosed--covering individual areas such as desktop services, manufacturing systems, and financial systems. The total value is expected to be $15 billion, with most of the agreements lasting five years. GM isn't setting rules about how much of the business can be awarded to a single vendor. Accenture, EDS, Hewlett-Packard, and IBM are the leading contenders for the bulk of the service contracts; software vendors will work directly with the firm responsible for each area.

Software has for years been an increasing part of the vehicle design process. Now, software and electronics are the biggest single expense in the production of a vehicle, accounting for a third of the cost, Scott said, and that trend will accelerate. The lines of software code in a GM car, which grew from 100,000 to 1 million lines between 1970 and 1990, will reach a staggering 100 million by 2010, Scott predicted. "What that tells me is that GM's going to have a major software problem between now and 2010, and we're going to need your help," he said. For example, software vendors will be required to include their products in the bumper-to-bumper warranties.

The growth of in-car software is powered by demands such as better navigation systems, more interaction with mobile devices such as cell phones and MP3 players, and emerging technology such as adaptive cruise control that slows a car if the vehicle in front slows. Already, more than 20,000 remote diagnostic reports, which GM needs to assess for possible problems in manufacturing or design, come in monthly via OnStar.

With software looming large in GM's plans, Scott has advice for vendors: Make maintenance programs and upgrade paths less complex and more affordable. When vendors tinker with long-term licensing fees, it creates a burden for GM, which often has to revisit outsourcing contracts that were based on existing licensing agreements. Said Scott: "None of that has any benefit for GM. It's just a cost." When it comes to suppliers that add cost without benefit, GM has never been known for its patience.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

IT Leadership: 10 Ways to Unleash Enterprise Innovation
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  6/8/2021
Preparing for the Upcoming Quantum Computing Revolution
John Edwards, Technology Journalist & Author,  6/3/2021
How SolarWinds Changed Cybersecurity Leadership's Priorities
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/26/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
White Papers
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll