Google's Wi-Fi Plan For San Francisco Stirs Privacy Debate - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
News

Google's Wi-Fi Plan For San Francisco Stirs Privacy Debate

Privacy advocates have raised concerns over Google's proposal for "free" Wi-Fi service in San Francisco, which would target users with advertising based on their location.

Privacy advocates have raised concerns over Google's proposed free Wi-Fi service in San Francisco, which would target users with advertising based on their location.

Most troubling is the potential of tracking where people go on the Web based on the user names and passwords they use in signing on to the network. If that information is stored in a database, then government or private lawyers can subpoena it later in criminal or civil matters.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based privacy group, has submitted to the city guidelines and minimum standards it considers necessary for protecting people's privacy. The recommendations have been taken under advisement, but it's unclear how much impact they will have on negotiations between Google and its partners, and Chris Vein, the head of the city's technology department.

Any deal, however, would ultimately have to be approved by the city's Board of Supervisors.

The EFF has recommended that people be allowed to surf anonymously on the wireless network, which would operate at a less than broadband speed of 300 kilobytes per second. In addition, the group does not want information on users stored in databases long enough to become a potential problem for users.

"We're asking that the system allow people to surf and to post and read things anonymously," Kurt Opsahl, staff attorney for EFF, said Monday. "Because the system requires people to sign on, it creates the opportunity for persistent tracking."

Google would deliver advertising based on the location of the node, or Wi-Fi transmitter, people were using to access the system. The company, however, says it's too early in the process to know how the final deal will address user privacy.

"The privacy of our users remains of utmost importance," the Mountain View, Calif., company said in an emailed statement. "We are in the very early stages of the planning process and look forward to working with the City of San Francisco and EarthLink to provide free Wi-Fi access to the residents of San Francisco."

The city chose the bid of Google and Earthlink last week from a total of six proposals. Earthlink would operate a paid service on the network without advertising. Also helping in the construction of the citywide network are Motorola and Tropos Networks. Earthlink has pegged the cost at $8 million.

All provisions of the bid, however, are up for negotiations, which mean none have been accepted or rejected by the city.

The Google-Earthlink proposal addressed privacy, saying that the system would "not store the content of any of your online communications or data transfers."

"On a regular basis, we delete account and usage information associated with your use of Google Wi-Fi," an excerpt of the proposal sent by Google says.

Privacy and the use of the Internet recently took center stage in a Bush administration effort to gather data from search engines and other companies as part of a civil case to revive an anti-pornography law that was struck down by the Supreme Court.

The Department of Justice subpoenaed information from 34 Internet service providers, Internet search companies, and security software firms. Google, however, refused to turn over the data, saying the request was overly broad. The government trimmed its request, and a San Jose, Calif., federal court ruled that Google had to turn over some search-related information, but far less than originally requested. None of the data requested by the government could be used to identify individuals or groups.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
The State of IT & Cybersecurity Operations 2020
The State of IT & Cybersecurity Operations 2020
Download this report from InformationWeek, in partnership with Dark Reading, to learn more about how today's IT operations teams work with cybersecurity operations, what technologies they are using, and how they communicate and share responsibility--or create risk by failing to do so. Get it now!
News
IT Spending Forecast: Unfortunately, It's Going to Hurt
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/15/2020
Commentary
Helping Developers and Enterprises Answer the Skills Dilemma
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  5/19/2020
Slideshows
Top 10 Programming Languages in Demand Right Now
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  4/28/2020
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Key to Cloud Success: The Right Management
This IT Trend highlights some of the steps IT teams can take to keep their cloud environments running in a safe, efficient manner.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll