Steerage To The Stars: The Cheapsat Revolution - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Cloud computing
News
8/27/2014
08:06 AM
John Barnes
John Barnes
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Steerage To The Stars: The Cheapsat Revolution

As the cost of putting small digital satellites in orbit continues to fall, what can these little explorers do? Businesses, agencies, and scientists want in.
Previous
1 of 6
Next

Several tiny satellites, photographed from the International Space Station. (Image: NASA)
Several tiny satellites, photographed from the International Space Station.
(Image: NASA)

As secondary payloads lower effective launch costs, the "cheapsat" revolution will rapidly expand, diversify, and differentiate the commercial, military, and scientific exploitation of space.

The spacecraft -- variously called cheapsats, small satellites, smallsats, microsatellites, or nanosats -- are dedicated, single-user, and limited-use satellites that fit under some threshold. These are typical but not definitive:

  • Cost: <$2.5 million from concept to orbiting hardware
  • Mass: <100 kg of payload with at most 100 kg additional fuel
  • Needed payload space: <1 cubic meter

Modern electronics and robotics can pack an immense variety of sensing, computing, and communications gear and capabilities within those limits.  

Organizations as diverse as a commercial weather forecasting firm, a news service, the military of a small nation, a big university, the National Geographic Society, Greenpeace, the DEA, and the International Maritime Organization could have significant use for these "little satellites that could."

The real barrier to truly cheap cheapsats has been launch cost. SpaceX tried with the Falcon I, losing its only actual paid payload, and four customers with it, before switching its remaining scheduled cheapsats to the big, reliable Falcon 9. Aside from obvious engineering reasons -- it is better to put a payload on a rocket with a record of successfully getting to orbit -- this also fits what is turning out to be a much better business model for cheapsats: secondary launch.

Secondary launch is steerage to the stars. Just as sailing ships crammed the rudder-line operation space full of impoverished immigrants, big launchers carrying large, heavy, expensive primary payloads are increasingly selling their ballast space to cheapsats.

Contemporary big-lifter rockets lack true throttlabilty (big main engines are all on or all off, once), and need full fuel tanks for structural integrity during liftoff. Without the options of "engines to half" or flying mostly empty, they need ballast whenever they lift less-than-maximum loads to lower-than-highest orbits.

Just as steerage space on an Atlantic packet could be sold at far below primary-customer prices, so can ballast mass capacity on a Falcon 9, Atlas, Delta, Ariane, H2, Antares, Dnepr, Molniya, or Soyuz, to name the systems that already routinely carry secondary payloads. The requisite business structure and technology (see the following slides) are increasingly in place.

Of course, as with steerage, the big customer calls the tune: Typically the launching organization isn't liable for putting your satellite into the wrong orbit, launching on schedule, last-minute bumping, or outright losing the satellite by launch accident. Then again, though the budget sailing ship passenger of days gone by got no compensation if he missed his ship or fell overboard, steerage still pushed the cost down far enough to overrun whole new worlds.

John Barnes has 31 commercially published and 2 self-published novels,  along with hundreds of magazine articles, short stories, blog posts, and encyclopedia articles.  Most of his life he has written professionally; his day jobs have included teaching at every ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Previous
1 of 6
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
8/27/2014 | 2:16:13 PM
Re: Right up there with DNA analysis as a cost breakthrough for science
Needed: an orbital Swiffer
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
8/27/2014 | 11:44:49 AM
Right up there with DNA analysis as a cost breakthrough for science
This sounds like kind of cost-cut breakthrough that has unleashed DNA analysis and research that used to take years and cost millions. On thought of concern is that commercial space enterprises unleashed will put so much space junk aloft it will endanger more critical satellites and future maned space missions. I've read that space agencies are already worried about that problem and are stuggling to keep track of all the objects in Earth's orbit. 
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

Slideshows
10 Things Your Artificial Intelligence Initiative Needs to Succeed
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  4/20/2021
News
Tech Spending Climbs as Digital Business Initiatives Grow
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  4/22/2021
Commentary
Optimizing the CIO and CFO Relationship
Mary E. Shacklett, Mary E. Shacklett,  4/13/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Slideshows
Flash Poll