Tim Cook: Privacy Is Worth Protecting - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Cybersecurity
Commentary
8/15/2016
12:05 PM
Eric Zeman
Eric Zeman
Commentary
50%
50%

Tim Cook: Privacy Is Worth Protecting

Apple CEO Tim Cook leans on the Founding Fathers to suggest the company did the right thing when asked by the FBI to unlock a terrorist's iPhone. It's an issue that affects IT professionals who need to protect company data, as well as consumers and their personal information.

iPhone Encryption: 5 Ways It's Changed Over Time
iPhone Encryption: 5 Ways It's Changed Over Time
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Apple caused quite a stir earlier this year when it refused a request from the US Department of Justice to unlock a suspected terrorist's iPhone. At the time, Apple argued that the request would affect more than a single smartphone, that it was unconstitutional, and that it would weaken security for everyone.

Now, Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, tells The Washington Post that the issue boils down to civil rights.

In a wide-ranging interview that covers host of topics, the Post's Jena McGregor dug deep on the FBI's fight with Apple and Apple's response.

"We knew it was going to be very, very difficult. And that the cards were stacked against us," responded Cook. "But we spent a lot of time on 'what is right here?'"

First, Apple set out to determine if it even could unlock the iPhone per the FBI's request. Cook explains that exploring the technical issue helped determine its response to the FBI. As Cook told the Post:

The lightbulb went off, and it became clear what was right: Could we create a tool to unlock the phone? After a few days, we had determined yes, we could. Then the question was, ethically, should we? We thought, you know, that depends on whether we could contain it or not. Other people were involved in this, too -- deep security experts and so forth, and it was apparent from those discussions that we couldn't be assured. The risk of what happens if it got out, we felt, could be incredibly terrible for public safety.

Cook goes on to suggest that people should not need to be computer experts to set up privacy and security protections -- including ones from the government. From that point of view, consumers and businesses rely on companies such as Apple to do some of the work for them. Apple provides the encryption and iPhone owners are then allowed to create their own key.

(Image: Peter Burnett/iStockphoto)

(Image: Peter Burnett/iStockphoto)

Apple doesn't believe the government should have access to that or any other key.

"In this case, it was unbelievably uncomfortable and not something that we wished for, wanted -- we didn't even think it was right. Honestly? I was shocked that [the FBI] would even ask for this," explained Cook. "That was the thing that was so disappointing that I think everybody lost. There are 200-plus other countries in the world. Zero of them had ever asked [Apple to do] this."

[Read about Edward Snowden's new iPhone add-on for security.]

The FBI eventually figured out how to unlock the iPhone in question without Apple's help.

Privacy is a right to be protected, believes Cook: "In my point of view, [privacy] is a civil liberty that our Founding Fathers thought of a long time ago and concluded it was an essential part of what it was to be an American. Sort of on the level, if you will, with freedom of speech, freedom of the press."

Clearly there is room to disagree with Apple's stance, as the FBI did.

The argument takes on a more interesting color when one considers how it should apply to the phones owned by businesses and used by executives.

Everyone knows smartphones contain hordes of personal and business data. What if the government wants or needs access to a phone that contains trade secrets or other sensitive company information?

Should the phone maker be beholden to give that data to the government? Is it possible to protect business data while complying with law enforcement requests?

It's certainly a topic IT and company leadership should be prepared to discuss.

Eric is a freelance writer for InformationWeek specializing in mobile technologies. View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jastroff
50%
50%
jastroff,
User Rank: Ninja
8/17/2016 | 10:20:37 AM
Re: Always surprised
@vnewman2 - I wonder if Apple is the new Polaroid - a category buster, that had a long run, and then faded. 
vnewman2
50%
50%
vnewman2,
User Rank: Ninja
8/16/2016 | 8:28:44 PM
Re: Always surprised
"Care taker instead of trail blazer" That's a fantastic way to put it. Not that I think he won't do anything earth-shattering without Steve - although I guess time will tell.
Technocrati
50%
50%
Technocrati,
User Rank: Ninja
8/16/2016 | 8:12:41 PM
Re: Always surprised

"...I don't think he will ever think of Apple as truly his!"

 

@vnewman2   I agree.  But rather than beat him up for his lack of vision as I might normally do, I have come to respect his stance here.  Cook understands himself and understands he is more of a care taker than a trail blazer.  

 

And I supposed there is nothing wrong with that, we all have different strengths and doing a fraction of what Job's achieved doesn't appear to be his thing.

Technocrati
50%
50%
Technocrati,
User Rank: Ninja
8/16/2016 | 8:06:09 PM
Re: Always surprised

@Whoopty    I agree.   I disagree with Cook on many things but his stance here is commendable.

vnewman2
50%
50%
vnewman2,
User Rank: Ninja
8/16/2016 | 3:27:26 PM
Re: Always surprised
@Whoopty - I read the entire interview and agree that Jobs' death seems particularly traumatic for Cook, and I believe he attempts to run Apple using a "WWSD" (What would Steve do?) mentality. I don't think he will ever think of Apple as truly his!
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
8/16/2016 | 7:27:07 AM
Always surprised
Although I don't agree with Apple on a lot of its business pracices, I've always been pleasantly surprised when it continues to defend privacy. Steve Jobs was a big proponent of it and Cook seems to be following through with his ideals, which I'm really pleased to see.

Good on him.
Commentary
Enterprise Guide to Digital Transformation
Cathleen Gagne, Managing Editor, InformationWeek,  8/13/2019
Slideshows
IT Careers: How to Get a Job as a Site Reliability Engineer
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  7/31/2019
Commentary
AI Ethics Guidelines Every CIO Should Read
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  8/7/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Data Science and AI in the Fast Lane
This IT Trend Report will help you gain insight into how quickly and dramatically data science is influencing how enterprises are managed and where they will derive business success. Read the report today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll