US Moving From Technology Leader To Laggard - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Government // Cybersecurity
02:15 PM

US Moving From Technology Leader To Laggard

R&D, science, and technology investments aren't keeping pace with other nations -- and face growing risks from cybertheft, according to government reports.

Many people around the world marvel at the science and technology wizardry of the United States. It seems it has been that way for years. The nation’s prosperity and security has become so heavily reliant on advances in science and technology that some say it has become the single most essential component of our economy.

The US still spends more than every other country on science and technology research and development. At last count there are 20 science and technology agencies with the US federal government alone, as well as the hundreds of private sector organizations, actively engaged in science and technology research. All this has placed the US at the top of the list when it comes to research and development spending. So why then why is the US losing ground?

Clearly one reason is the surge in investments elsewhere. In March 2011, the BBC reported that the US would fall from the No. 1 country for scientific output -- and be overtaken by China -- by the end of this year. This was not the first warning of this development. The BBC in December 2006 similarly reported that China had surpassed Japan to become the world's No. 2 and that China is closing in on the amount of R&D spending in the United States.

Last month, an unclassified US Intelligence Community report, released by the US Intelligence Community, concluded the "U.S. technological superiority is diminishing in important areas." This telling report is a must read for anyone involved with or interested in national security and intelligence or in the defense intelligence industry. A US Army study is said to have determined that some of our adversaries might already have the edge over the US in cyberwarfare as well as other concerning areas.

What is not included in the report are concerns raised in a global R&D forecast by the non-profit research organization, Battelle, which noted "R&D sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense will see one of the biggest declines (down $2.5 billion to $75 billion forecast for 2012) for the third consecutive year."

[R&D investments are also facing greater risk of cybertheft. Read: Stealing America’s Future.]

It would be unfair to say this is the cause of the US decline in strategic military and intelligence capabilities. The answer is far more complex. First of all we need to look at education. The availability of an appropriate level of properly skilled people in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics is critical -- and by all accounts the US is falling short. It makes little sense to increase funding in research and development of new technology when we do not have properly skilled individuals to staff it; and given the criticality we certainly do not want to outsource this.

Published reports show the US ratings in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are slipping. Despite President Barack Obama’s insistence, in 2010, that "Leadership tomorrow depends on how we educate our students today -- especially in science, technology, engineering and math," where is nation’s investment in STEM teachers, curriculum, and facilities?

Now consider that the research and development efforts that we are funding and have the resources to staff are constantly under the threat of espionage, particularly cyber espionage. Historically espionage activities were focused on collecting political and military intelligence. That has certainly changed!

Today, cyberspies steal entire sets of blueprints for sensitive systems for commercial gains as well as military and intelligence reasons. The theft of US intellectual property has been reported at levels within the government and private sectors that seem unbelievable. One report estimates that IP theft is costing the US an estimated $300 billion a year. A 2012 report found that the output of intellectual property intensive industries is responsible for at least 40 million jobs and deliver more than 34% of the US gross domestic product (GDP). These two areas are critical and must be addressed if the US is to regain our status as a technological innovator.

Technology has permeated virtually every aspect of our lives. Stop and think for a moment just how influential technology has become in the way we live, socialize, and work as well as our nation’s security. We are now aware that the investment in science and technology research and development by other countries is outpacing that of the US.

It would be a sure bet that this foreign science and technology investment is not limited to just defense and intelligence technologies. In addition, several areas of technology identified in the report have applications outside of intelligence and their value cuts across many industry segments.

Kevin Coleman was the chief strategist at Netscape and works now as a subject matter expert and adviser on strategic technology issues and opportunities. He writes regularly on emerging challenges associated with technology, including cyberwarfare, cyber intelligence, and cyber diplomacy.

Moving email to the cloud has lowered IT costs and improved efficiency. Find out what federal agencies can learn from early adopters in "The Great Email Migration" report. (Free registration required.)

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
12/4/2013 | 12:43:43 PM
The government and study isn't perfect but to discount it is foolish and negligent
The data supporting this is far beyond the DOD snippet.  Our academic output of STEM graduates is in decline and has been for more than 10 years while other countries are maintaining a steady stream, and in many cases growing ouput of STEM graduates.

Look at most US corps focus in tech advancement and it has been to cut costs.  The US doesn't need more cost containment leaders and cultures-you can train a monkey to cut costs--it needs more strategic leaders who see ways to drive revenue or impact the customer/stakeholder through the use of technology.  One of the issues is that so few tech and IT leaders have any real sense of business with the number one commandment of sustaining profit and growing revenue and keeping the firm healthy.  Healthy and growing firms provide much needed jobs and focus on innovation and continuous R&D. 

This study and others like it offer real value for the leaders who really are in the know.  If the US's largest employer is the government (which it is), and if R&D spending is dropping, then this will spill over into private and other public areas of technology and quickly.  BTW----corporate spend on R&D has been dropping too. 

Historically the US government's research and spending on technology provided critical and necessary value and data to private industry for the last 50 years and to ignore it is just not sound strategic nor balanced thinking. 

A drop in R&D on technology and/or US based STEM candidates only means one thing and it isn't good news for those that want to see the US continue to grow and remain a leader.  It also is not good news for those in the technology product, engineering, or corporate IT marketplace, and the future candidates we so desparately need to come out of school for us to remain in our # slot. 

The fact that so many current tech, corporate IT, and engineering leaders are not in the know, and solidly stuck in quadrant one of Maslows's Competency Model clearly shows we are sliding down the hill and mostly unaware.  The widespread data in many studies all indicate the same thing, both from the government and private industry. 
User Rank: Author
12/3/2013 | 10:22:46 AM
Re: Sounds Like A Plea For DOD Funding
I don't think it's a plea for DOD funding specifically, but these studies (most of whose backers are unnamed in this piece) often have vested interests. Every federal and commercial interest with a heavy R&D component wants more funding, so it's in their interests to say the sky is falling. I'm not saying US spending on R&D is everything it should be--I don't know. But it's always important to evalulate who the chicken littles are.
User Rank: Author
12/2/2013 | 4:44:49 PM
Re: Sounds Like A Plea For DOD Funding
What DOD spends on R&D is likely to be a poor indicator of US R&D investments, given the wind down of military presence abroad and the sequestration.  Even DARPA is absorbing serious cutbacks.   What's maddening is the continued inaction in Congress on H-1B visas that could at least partially build up STEM expertise here in the US instead of forcing so many companies and talented individuals to go off shore.

D. Henschen
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Author
12/2/2013 | 4:10:26 PM
Sounds Like A Plea For DOD Funding
If our scientific mastery is measured by DOD spending, God help us. I'd rather not fund the DOD if it means coming up with better ways to spy on citizens and kill people. We don't need better drones, missles and massive surveillance programs. We need to solve hunger, improve world health and reduce dependence on petrochemicals -- pretty much the problems the Gates Foundation is going after.

Why not measure innovation based on the scientific output of U.S.-based colleges, universities, and commercial businesses. Instead we foster xenophobic paranoia about cyber theft from abroad and fear of what China is up to. Stop listening to the dark warnings from hawks and start thinking about what's right for people. 
Enterprise Guide to Digital Transformation
Cathleen Gagne, Managing Editor, InformationWeek,  8/13/2019
IT Careers: How to Get a Job as a Site Reliability Engineer
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  7/31/2019
AI Ethics Guidelines Every CIO Should Read
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  8/7/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
Data Science and AI in the Fast Lane
This IT Trend Report will help you gain insight into how quickly and dramatically data science is influencing how enterprises are managed and where they will derive business success. Read the report today!
Flash Poll