Institute Of Medicine Sets Health IT Vision - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Leadership
News
12/29/2010
01:55 PM
50%
50%

Institute Of Medicine Sets Health IT Vision

Report explores opportunities for accelerating digital healthcare infrastructure to improve patient and public health outcomes.

Health IT Boosts Patient Care, Safety
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Health IT Boosts Patient Care, Safety
The vision of a safe, efficient and cost-effective healthcare system supported by information technology was outlined in a recent Institute of Medicine report, The Learning Health System Series: The Digital Infrastructure.

According to the report, the primary intent of the meetings which informed it was to identify and explore strategic opportunities for accelerating the evolution of a digital infrastructure -- described as "the (healthcare) system's nerve center, its circulation system, or the engine" -- that will support and drive continuous improvement.

The report identified several rules to guide healthcare which are intended to bring more, and more appropriate, information to bear for both clinicians and patients at the point of care.

The goal is to bring about the "emergence of a digital infrastructure that allows data collected during activities in various settings -- clinical, research, and public health -- to be integrated, analyzed, and broadly applied ('collect once, use for multiple purposes') to inform and improve clinical care decisions, promote patient education and self-management, design public health strategies, and support research and knowledge development efforts in a timely manner."

The report heavily endorsed both the incorporation of population health data into the clinical decision-making process and, "the direct involvement and support of patient and population roles in the generation of knowledge through the incorporation of user-generated data; understanding the benefits of information use in patient care and population health improvement; and improving patient access to health information to allow for a more active role in care decisions."

In terms of recommendations, the report supported taking an "ultra-large-scale systems (ULS) approach" to developing a digital infrastructure.

"ULS refers to the existence of a virtual system that has bearing on a social purpose -- e.g. improving health and healthcare -- and in which a few key elements, such as interchange representation, may be standardized, but whose many participants have diverse and even conflicting goals, so adaptability is key. Institutions retain flexibility for innovation in their choices, and evolutionary functional change can be shaped by architectural precepts, incentives, and compliance assessment, but not by centralized control."

The report went on: "ULS functionality is therefore facilitated by protocols that allow maximum practical flexibility for participants. Incorporating decentralization of data, development, and operational authority and control, this approach fosters local innovation, personalization, and emergent behaviors. Participants felt that this approach was well suited to the complex adaptive characteristics of the health system, and that it could serve as an anchoring framework for approaching both the social and technical components of the overall infrastructure."

On a more granular level, the report said stakeholders should endorse, "the principle of parsimony and minimizing centralization that might constitute a barrier to entry: specify only the minimal set of standards or requirements necessary for key functional utility, and push the maximum amount of control to the periphery."

In setting the stage for its recommendations, the report seemed to specifically note that Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) was a much-needed step in the evolution of a digital healthcare system. "...The diversity and limited compatibility of the products, and the lack of economic incentives to their use has, to date, restrained the broader uptake, application, and functional utility of digital capacity across the system."

The report was the result of three meetings held in the summer and fall of 2010, bringing together researchers, computer scientists, privacy experts, clinicians, healthcare administrators, health IT professionals, representatives of patient advocacy groups, healthcare policymakers, and other stakeholders.

Anthony Guerra is the founder and editor of healthsystemCIO.com, a site dedicated to serving the strategic information needs of healthcare CIOs. He can be reached at [email protected]

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Commentary
Enterprise Guide to Edge Computing
Cathleen Gagne, Managing Editor, InformationWeek,  10/15/2019
News
Rethinking IT: Tech Investments that Drive Business Growth
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  10/3/2019
Slideshows
IT Careers: 12 Job Skills in Demand for 2020
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  10/1/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Getting Started With Emerging Technologies
Looking to help your enterprise IT team ease the stress of putting new/emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning and IoT to work for their organizations? There are a few ways to get off on the right foot. In this report we share some expert advice on how to approach some of these seemingly daunting tech challenges.
Slideshows
Flash Poll