Open Data Coalition Criticizes SEC Backtracking - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Government // Open Government

Open Data Coalition Criticizes SEC Backtracking

Congress urged to direct SEC to require small public companies to file financial data in open data formats.

The US House of Representatives shouldn't let the Securities and Exchange Commission exempt as many as 60% of public companies from publishing their corporate filings in open-data formats, a technology group declared in an open letter to Congress Thursday.

In a letter to the House Financial Services Committee, the Data Transparency Coalition recommended that committee members require the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to enforce the quality of financial disclosure data it collects. It also urged the SEC to avoid allowing exemptions that run counter to the demand for public data in machine-readable, open-data formats.

The letter comes in the wake of the committee's March 14 approval of the Small Company Disclosure Simplification Act (H.R. 4164), which would exempt companies with less than $250 million in annual revenue from requirements to file their 10-K and 10-Q forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), and instead allowing them to publish in the traditional documents-based mode.

[The Obama administration is also in favor of open data. Read: White House Issues Open Data Action Plan.]

Rep. Robert Hurt (R-Va.) introduced the bill on March 6 to streamline regulations for small public companies and remove a disincentive for companies to access capital in the public markets.

But the proposed exemption would apply to roughly 60% of publicly traded companies, the coalition said.

Virginia Rep. Robert Hurt introduced the Small Company Disclosure Simplification Act.
Virginia Rep. Robert Hurt introduced the Small Company Disclosure Simplification Act.

The SEC's "failure to apply basic quality control" to public companies' financial disclosure data is a detriment to the investors and markets that the coalition serves, the group said in its letter. Offering such an exemption from XBRL to the majority of public companies "will likely impede efforts to address the problem," the coalition said.

"H.R. 4164 is based on a flawed diagnosis that blames open-data tools for the symptoms of poor data quality," Hudson Hollister, the coalition's executive director said in a statement. "Instead of decimating this critical data set, Congress should direct the SEC to stop accepting inaccurate submissions, so the data set becomes useful. Once the data set can be analyzed without costly corrections, analysts will be able to expand their coverage, and smaller public companies will get more attention. Our capital markets want quality data -- not less of it."

The coalition addressed its letter to House Financial Services Committee chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) and ranking member Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).

In addition to exempting public companies with less than $250 million in annual revenue from the requirement to use XBRL for financial statements and other mandatory reporting requirements, H.R. 4164 also directs the SEC to analyze the costs and benefits to such companies of using XBRL for financial statements. Also, the SEC would have to report to Congress the results of that analysis, information about progress in implementing XBRL reporting within the SEC, and data on the use of XBRL data by the SEC and by investors.

"Before cutting off the flow of comprehensive structured data for issuers below $250 million in revenue, we believe Congress should direct the SEC to correct the widespread material errors, of which many are simple and should be easily fixed," stated the letter. "If the quality of the data improved, investors and markets could use it without extensive correction and small issuers would benefit from expanded analyst coverage."

If the quality of data is improved, then investors and markets will be able to use it without extensive correction, the coalition said in its letter. What's more, small public companies would benefit from expanded analyst coverage.

The proposed exemption is out of step with recent legislation, such as the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act, which requires federal agencies to publish their financial information using structured data formats, the coalition said.

When information is not published in structured data formats, such as XBRL, that allows disclosure information to flow automatically into analysis systems, then it has to be rekeyed or optically recognized. This leads to additional time and expense, the coalition said.

Could the growing movement toward open source hardware rewrite the rules for computer and networking hardware the way Linux, Apache, and Android have for software? Also in the Open Source Hardware issue of InformationWeek: Mark Hurd explains his "once-in-a-career opportunity" at Oracle.

William Welsh is a contributing writer to InformationWeek Government. He has covered the government IT market since 2000 for publications such as Washington Technology and Defense Systems. View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
6/5/2014 | 2:54:19 PM
Same Stuff, Different Day
The amusing part is that the SEC has not worked for the American public in the past twenty-five some odd years as much as it is merely a grand farce to give the appearance of securities enforcement, so the fact that it wants to exempt publicly traded cos. from the open data format is not a newsflash. 
Lorna Garey
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Author
5/29/2014 | 2:46:14 PM
This decision does seem like a step backwards. I could see case-by-case exemptions, but 60%? That's just ridiculous.
2021 Outlook: Tackling Cloud Transformation Choices
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  1/4/2021
Enterprise IT Leaders Face Two Paths to AI
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  12/23/2020
10 IT Trends to Watch for in 2021
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/22/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you.
Flash Poll