Critical Access Rural Hospitals Lack Health IT - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Healthcare // Electronic Health Records
News
7/15/2011
12:42 PM
50%
50%

Critical Access Rural Hospitals Lack Health IT

While many hospitals are ramping up their adoption of electronic medical records and other technologies, a study shows that critical access hospitals are lagging behind in health IT implementation.

Health IT Boosts Patient Care, Safety
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Health IT Boosts Patient Care, Safety
Critical access hospitals (CAHs) that serve approximately 20% of the U.S. population living in rural communities, have fewer clinical capabilities, a lower quality of care, worse patient outcomes, and are less equipped with health information technology to support clinical workflows, a national study by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) has found.

The report, entitled: Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes in Critical Access Rural Hospitals, was published earlier this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The study's findings were based on analyzing the records of more than two million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries at 4,738 hospitals (27% of which were CAHs) diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), congestive heart failure, and pneumonia in 2008-2009. Compared with other hospitals, CAHs were less likely to have intensive care facilities, advanced cardiac care capabilities, or even basic electronic health records (EHRs).

With regard to EHRs, researchers concluded that federal government efforts to encourage CAHs to adopt EHRs could be improved. Under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, eligible CAHs that implement EHRs and meet Meaningful Use guidelines can qualify for incentive payments. However, many CAHs lack the financial resources and the personnel to implement and maintain health IT systems, researchers found.

"The federal effort to promote EHR adoption among CAHs has focused on technical assistance by the Regional Extension Centers. However, some Regional Extension Centers have elected not to work with CAHs and others are charging fees that may be unaffordable for CAHs. Policy makers may need to consider additional strategies to avoid exacerbating an already emerging digital divide," the report states.

According to Ashish Jha, senior author on the study and an associate professor in HSPH's Department of Health Policy and Management, it is troubling that CAHs are deficient in the use of technology.

"With regard to technology, the most surprising finding was the degree to which CAHs lagged behind on technologies that have become commonplace in many hospitals across the country--for example, only 66% of CAHs have electronic viewing of laboratory test results, compared with 91.3% of non-CAHs, and only 22% of CAHs use electronic clinical reminders, compared with 44% of non-CAHs," Jha said. "These findings were surprising because they highlight the degree to which these hospitals are at risk of falling even further behind as medicine becomes increasingly complex and technological."

Jha also said CAHs run the risk of being left behind in the healthcare system if they are unable to overcome the barriers standing between them and the effective adoption and use of health IT. With regard to developing systems that support evidence-based medicine and quality reporting measures, Jha said the omission of CAHs from most innovations such as pay-for-performance, public reporting, and value-based purchasing is a concern.

To overcome these challenges, policy efforts are needed to bring additional healthcare practitioners to underserved areas to ensure that CAHs have key clinical resources. And the increased use of telemedicine and clinical data exchange also has the potential to improve the quality of care, the report said.

Jha said telemedicine could help CAHs, which often have difficulty recruiting specialists, provide specialty care. He also said that while these systems could assist clinicians to make clinical decisions at the point of care when they are faced with complex clinical situations, telemedicine is not a panacea.

"For example, a tertiary care center could provide assistance with electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation for a patient suspected of having a heart attack, and help the on-site clinician with the decision of whether to give the patient lytic therapy or transfer him or her for cardiac catheterization," Jha said. "However, any telemedicine system that functions in isolation is likely to be less effective than one in which it functions as part of a fully integrated health information system."

In the new, all-digital InformationWeek Healthcare: iPads are leading a new wave of devices into the exam room. Are security, tech support, and infection control up to the task? Download it now. (Free registration required.)

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
Data Science: How the Pandemic Has Affected 10 Popular Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/9/2020
Commentary
The Growing Security Priority for DevOps and Cloud Migration
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  9/3/2020
Commentary
Dark Side of AI: How to Make Artificial Intelligence Trustworthy
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  9/15/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Automation Transforms Network Management
In this special report we will examine the layers of automation and orchestration in IT operations, and how they can provide high availability and greater scale for modern applications and business demands.
Slideshows
Flash Poll