Free EHR Helps Practice Fusion Grow - InformationWeek
Healthcare // Electronic Health Records
08:00 AM
Connect Directly

Free EHR Helps Practice Fusion Grow

Practice Fusion CEO Ryan Howard wants doctors to know they don't have to pay for the privilege of adopting electronic health records.

Adopting electronic health records (EHRs) is a challenge for any medical practice, but if doctors must suffer through it, Practice Fusion CEO Ryan Howard wants them to know they don't have to pay for the privilege. In fact, their participation is valuable enough that other players in the healthcare market will gladly pick up the tab.

"What people don't realize is the doctor is the master of the entire system -- even though they feel embattled and not empowered," Howard said in an interview. "Each doctor drives roughly $2.5 million in medical spend."

Thus, Practice Fusion has decided it can make a business out of providing electronic medical records software to doctors without needing to charge them for it. If the company can get their attention with software they find useful (and affordable), their active use of the software is valuable in and of itself. Today, electronic medical records (EMRs) are turning into EHRs, a change in terminology associated with the goal of making health data more portable, interoperable, and meaningful. In the sense of the federal government's Meaningful Use program of incentives and penalties, Practice Fusion is helping sole practitioners and small practices keep pace.

[ Many doctors think EHRs aren't worth the hassle. Learn Why Doctors Hate EHR Software. ]

Founded in 2005, Practice Fusion launched a cloud application for tracking medical records in 2007, and in the past few years it's become best known as the free solution that allows physicians to pocket government incentives for achieving Meaningful Use without a cash outlay for software. The company recently guaranteed it will be ready to support the stricter Meaningful Use Stage 2 requirements by the end of the year, so users will qualify for the 2014 round of incentives. The cost of the web-based application is supported by advertising and payments from pharmacy chains and other healthcare industry players who want to make it as easy as possible for doctors to send prescriptions and referrals their way. Practice Fusion also sells anonymized data that its partners can mine as part of public health and market research, Howard said.

Practice Fusion CEO Ryan Howard.

Giving the software away for free was not the original plan. Howard said:

We originally sold it for $300 per month, per doctor, which at the time was insanely cheaper anything on the market. But what we found out was it wasn't even about being lower cost. Doctors couldn't afford even that. The average primary care physician makes about $120,000 a year, and spending five percent of their income on software was not something they were super excited about. For a while, we went free [for the basic service] and $50 per month for support. But then I'd be talking to doctors, pitching them directly, and they'd start to haggle with me. They'd say, "I'll give you $25 a month." It happened enough that it got me thinking about yes, and how do we even process that in our system.

Finally, a member of his team suggested trying to offer it for free, as a test, for a day or a month, Howard said. "We had 22 doctors on the phone, on a webinar, and probably 18 or 19 would say yes to the free proposition." This was toward the end of 2007. Having discovered that free was the price that doctors really liked, Practice Fusion set about trying to establish the large-scale audience that would allow it to attract revenue from other sources.

The company almost didn't make it. "At the end of '08, we were out of cash," he told the San Francisco Chronicle in a 2011 interview. "We were fledgling, we had a couple thousand users, the market was a disaster." To make payroll, he sold his car and funneled money into the business from the rent on a home he owned in New Hampshire. He also diverted money into the business from the insurance payout from an accident racing his Ducati motorcycle. His motto for the company became: "Be scrappy."

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
1 of 4
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
1/2/2014 | 12:34:05 PM
Re: Oh My God Have you seen this?
pretty careless screwup
User Rank: Apprentice
1/1/2014 | 6:06:30 AM
Oh My God Have you seen this?
IW Pick
User Rank: Apprentice
11/16/2013 | 1:10:22 AM
All Hype, No Substance
This article fails to mention the significant concerns that exist about Practice Fusion (PF):

1.      PF has gone through close to $90million and has yet to make a profit.  Some may point to the fact that Amazon and Facebook do not or did not initially display large profits.  However, there is one key difference, the other two companies have huge market share. 


2.      Speaking of market share, PF has about 2% of US physicians using their software, or about 16K doctors (Medscape 2012 EHR Slide Show).  $90million and only 2% market share!  PF just obtained an additional $60million in funding and the CEO wants to "double its users".  So then PF will spend close to $150million to get 4% market share?  These are not very good numbers.  PF likes to obscure the facts about its user base by stating terms like "100,000 healthcare workers".  Remember, doctors represent only 16K of this number.  The rest are nurses, medical assistants, billers, receptionists, etc.  I strongly suspect the reason PF needed the additional $60million is because the company is burning through cash at a crazy pace. 


3.      PF has no billing component.  Ask any physician who has had separate EMR and billing systems and they will tell you that getting the two interfaced is torture.  It is not unheard of for physicians to lose several months revenue due to lack of connectivity.   Again $90million spent and no billing component. 


4.      PF recently came under harsh criticism from physicians and patients for not being clear on its posting of reviews by patients of doctors.  PF sent out emails to patients that appeared to have originated by the physician.  The patients then replied, often giving personal medical information as well as demographic data.  The patient responses were then posted in a public forum. Examples of disaster postings include patients who wrote about genital itching and those who received emails at work addressed from psychiatrists.


When doctors complained, PF deleted negative physician comments from its on line physician discussion forums.  There stands a good chance the Department of Health and Human Services will begin an investigation for a massive HIPAA violation.   


5.      Here is the most troubling fact of all: PF has a lousy EMR.  I am a physician and registered for their product.  I never made it past the demo.  I found the software to be clunky and not at all user friendly. 


Overall, I am not at all optimistic that this company can remain viable.  
David F. Carr
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
11/15/2013 | 12:08:00 PM
Is this too much like GMail for medical records?
The obvious question here is whether this is too much of a consumer model for a task like managing medical records.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Cybersecurity Strategies for the Digital Era
At its core, digital business relies on strong security practices. In addition, leveraging security intelligence and integrating security with operations and developer teams can help organizations push the boundaries of innovation.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll